65.2% moving floors · Press & Citation Kit
Numbers first: 65.2% (116 of 178) configurations in the drawdown-rule census use a floor that moves. Answer first: if you need one URL to cite, list, or share PropSurvival, use this page — copy-ready citations for the flagship first-party census, directory blurbs that stay inside our independence rules, and the link targets a partner or community resource list actually needs.
- Licence on study data
- CC BY 4.0 — attribute + link.
- Pass rates / rankings
- None. We do not publish them.
- Contact
- support@propsurvival.com
- Machine summary
- llms.txt
- Citable answer
- FAQ
- Free path
- Copy-ready citations
- Directory listing kit
- Community kit
- Link targets
- What this page refuses
Quick answer: In PropSurvival's first-party census of 178 account-size configurations across 43 verified prop-firm rule sets, 65.2% (116 of 178) use a drawdown floor that moves — end-of-day trailing (76), intraday trailing (27), or closed-balance trailing (13). The remaining 34.8% (62 of 178) keep a static floor for the life of the evaluation. This is a count of published rules in a frozen snapshot, not a pass-rate ranking of firms and not the live product corpus size.
The lead figure
65.2% of configurations (116 of 178) in the drawdown-rule census use a floor that moves — not a fixed static line for the life of the evaluation.
What kind of source
First-party corpus census and seeded Monte Carlo studies — not scraped review-site rankings. Datasets download as JSON under CC BY 4.0.
What is free
The full in-browser simulator at /app, plus embeddable widgets that run the same engine. Paid documents are optional depth, not a wall around the math.
FAQ — same answers as the structured data
Visible questions match the FAQPage JSON-LD on this page so answer engines and human readers get one text.
What share of prop-firm evaluation configurations use a moving drawdown floor?
65.2% (116 of 178) configurations in PropSurvival's first-party census across 43 verified rule sets use a floor that moves — end-of-day trailing (76), intraday trailing (27), or closed-balance trailing (13). The remaining 34.8% (62 of 178) use a static floor. Source: https://propsurvival.com/research-drawdown-landscape (CC BY 4.0). This is a count of published rules, not a pass-rate ranking of firms.
May I cite PropSurvival figures in an article or directory listing?
Yes. First-party study datasets ship under CC BY 4.0. Attribute PropSurvival and link the study URL. The copy-ready citations on this page are the preferred form.
Does PropSurvival publish pass rates or firm rankings?
No. PropSurvival publishes no pass rates, rankings, or comparative claims about any named firm. Firm rules are facts about published documents; how a given trader fares under them is computed locally from that trader's own statistics.
What is the one figure most useful for a directory blurb?
From the 2026 drawdown-rule census of 178 account-size configurations across 43 verified rule sets: 65.2% (116 of 178) use a drawdown floor that moves — end-of-day trailing, intraday trailing, or closed-balance trailing — rather than a fixed static line. The full breakdown and a CC BY 4.0 JSON download live at https://propsurvival.com/research-drawdown-landscape.
Working backwards: free path before a citation stays only a citation — after you copy the 65.2% figure, run the same free Monte Carlo against the live 59 firm rule sets / 243 account-size configurations. A good listing still ends with (1) one true number with a denominator, (2) a deep link to the study, (3) an honest product line — then a free trial of the engine itself. Nothing uploads.
1. Copy-ready citations
Prefer these forms over inventing a paraphrase. Study datasets are CC BY 4.0 — reuse the figures with attribution. The live rule corpus behind the product has grown since some studies froze their sample; when a study states “43 rule sets / 178 configurations,” that is the study's sample, not a claim that the live product corpus stopped there. The live count (currently 59 firm rule sets / 243 account-size configurations) is on the methodology page and in corpus-emitted page banners.
PropSurvival. (2026). The State of Prop-Firm Drawdown Rules: a census of 178 configurations across 43 verified rule sets [Dataset]. PropSurvival. https://propsurvival.com/research-drawdown-landscape — Key finding: 65.2% (116 of 178) configurations use a drawdown floor that moves (76 end-of-day trailing, 27 intraday trailing, 13 closed-balance trailing; 62 static). Licence: CC BY 4.0.
Study page: research-drawdown-landscape · JSON: research-drawdown-landscape-data.json
PropSurvival. (2026). Prop-firm evaluation-fee census: transcribed stickers across 243 configurations and 59 rule sets [Dataset]. PropSurvival. https://propsurvival.com/research-prop-firm-fee-comparison — Key finding: 63 of 243 configs (25.9%) have a transcribed published sticker; at $100,000 the range is $189–$750 (3.97×, n=11). 180 of 243 (74.1%) are unrecorded, not free. No pass-rate ranking. Licence: CC BY 4.0.
Study page: research-prop-firm-fee-comparison · JSON: research-prop-firm-fee-comparison-data.json
PropSurvival. (2026). Static vs trailing drawdown: isolating the floor mechanic across 8 prop firm rule sets [Dataset]. PropSurvival. https://propsurvival.com/research-static-vs-trailing — One fixed trader profile, 20,000 seeded paths per cell (mulberry32, seed 12345), each rule set vs a static-floor counterfactual of the same set. Subject is the mechanic, not a firm ranking. Licence: CC BY 4.0.
Study page: research-static-vs-trailing · JSON: research-static-vs-trailing-data.json
PropSurvival. (2026). Prop-firm challenge rule corpus (59 firm rule sets, 243 account-size configurations) [Dataset]. Retrieved from https://propsurvival.com/research-methodology
Methodology: research-methodology · dated re-reads: changelog · machine feed: rule-changes.xml / rule-changes.json
Show BibTeX
@misc{propsurvival2026drawdowncensus,
author = {PropSurvival},
title = {The State of Prop-Firm Drawdown Rules: a census of 178 configurations},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://propsurvival.com/research-drawdown-landscape}},
note = {CC BY 4.0. 65.2\% (116 of 178) configurations use a moving drawdown floor. JSON at research-drawdown-landscape-data.json}
}
2. Directory listing kit
Use these blurbs as-is for tool directories, resource lists, and community wikis. They are written to stay inside PropSurvival's independence register: no firm ranking, no pass-rate claim, no imperative advice-voice.
Short (≤ 280 characters)
Medium (directory “about” field)
Category tags (pick what fits the directory's taxonomy)
- Prop firm challenge calculator / evaluation simulator
- Monte Carlo risk of ruin / survival probability
- Trailing drawdown explainer + calculator
- Trading risk-management tools (personal rules mode)
- Open research / CC BY dataset (prop-firm rule census)
3. Community kit
Ready text for a community resource list, wiki, sticky, or a single factual reply — not a marketing thread. Where a community bans self-promotion, do not post this as self-promotion; offer it only when a human asked for a source, a calculator, or a citation.
Resource-list entry
One-fact reply (when someone asks “do most prop evals trail?”)
Embed offer (when a host page wants a live calculator)
Partner price-card embed (cite the one-time price without retyping it)
One-step act after you decide to cite us: copy the iframe snippet. The card reads Situation Report · $29 · one-time · one month from the live pricing source and keeps the required via PropSurvival attribution link. Do not strip the attribution. Checkout prices are those charged at purchase time.
Operator placement playbooks (send criteria, 15-target channel ledger, pitch templates — no mass blast) live owner-side; this public page is the asset those pitches point at.
4. Link targets partners and directories should use
Prefer deep links over the homepage when the listing is about a specific claim. All URLs below are clean (no .html suffix).
| Intent | URL | What it is |
|---|---|---|
| This kit (canonical cite hub) | https://propsurvival.com/press | Citations, blurbs, targets |
| Lead data story | https://propsurvival.com/research-drawdown-landscape | 178-config census + figure |
| Fee / cost comparison | https://propsurvival.com/research-prop-firm-fee-comparison | 63 of 243 transcribed stickers · $100k 3.97× |
| Fee-census JSON (CC BY) | https://propsurvival.com/research-prop-firm-fee-comparison-data.json | Machine-readable sticker table |
| Census JSON (CC BY) | https://propsurvival.com/research-drawdown-landscape-data.json | Machine-readable dataset |
| Mechanic study | https://propsurvival.com/research-static-vs-trailing | Static vs trailing isolation |
| How rules are verified | https://propsurvival.com/research-methodology | Provenance + cite block |
| Trailing floor arithmetic | https://propsurvival.com/trailing-drawdown | Derived explainer, no firm rank |
| Free simulator | https://propsurvival.com/app | Full Monte Carlo in-browser |
| Personal rules mode | https://propsurvival.com/app?rules=personal | No firm required |
| Embeddable widgets | https://propsurvival.com/embed | iframe gallery + snippets |
| Rule-fact badge (source card) | https://propsurvival.com/embed/fact-badge?firm=ftmo2&fact=daily-loss-limit | One dated published rule value; swap firm/fact params |
| Methodology cite block | https://propsurvival.com/research-methodology#cite | Live corpus plain-text + BibTeX source |
| AI / crawler map | https://propsurvival.com/llms.txt | Curated citation map |
| Affiliate terms | https://propsurvival.com/affiliates | 20%; prop firms ineligible |
| One-time price card (partner badge) | https://propsurvival.com/partner/price-badge | Citeable Situation Report $29 · one-time · one month; keep attribution |
| Pricing (only price source) | https://propsurvival.com/pricing | Do not retype prices elsewhere |
5. What this page refuses
- No pass rates for named firms — a number about a trader under a rule set is computed from that trader's inputs, never asserted as a firm's business metric.
- No firm rankings or easiest-firm language — mechanic comparisons (static vs trailing floors) are about rules, not operators.
- No paid placement of firm listings — the corpus is not for sale to the firms it describes; see methodology §6.
- No affiliate eligibility for prop firms or their staff — affiliates states the permanent rule.
- No inventing a PropSurvival price — cite the price card or link /pricing; never retype a dollar figure that could drift from checkout.
- No inventing third-party traffic or “featured on” claims — this kit ships ready copy; mentions and backlinks are earned after placement, not asserted here in advance.
Corrections welcome. If a firm's published documentation no longer matches a stored rule, or a citation on this page is wrong, email support@propsurvival.com with the firm's page URL. Confirmed corrections land on the dated changelog, not as silent rewrites.
Questions about reuse, a directory listing, or a data figure: support@propsurvival.com.