Skip to content
PropSurvival
Press · directories · communities

65.2% moving floors · Press & Citation Kit

Published 2026-08-16 · free to cite (CC BY 4.0 on study datasets)

Numbers first: 65.2% (116 of 178) configurations in the drawdown-rule census use a floor that moves. Answer first: if you need one URL to cite, list, or share PropSurvival, use this page — copy-ready citations for the flagship first-party census, directory blurbs that stay inside our independence rules, and the link targets a partner or community resource list actually needs.

Licence on study data
CC BY 4.0 — attribute + link.
Pass rates / rankings
None. We do not publish them.
Contact
support@propsurvival.com
Machine summary
llms.txt
Citable answer · extract this block

Quick answer: In PropSurvival's first-party census of 178 account-size configurations across 43 verified prop-firm rule sets, 65.2% (116 of 178) use a drawdown floor that moves — end-of-day trailing (76), intraday trailing (27), or closed-balance trailing (13). The remaining 34.8% (62 of 178) keep a static floor for the life of the evaluation. This is a count of published rules in a frozen snapshot, not a pass-rate ranking of firms and not the live product corpus size.

Source (CC BY 4.0): https://propsurvival.com/research-drawdown-landscape · JSON: research-drawdown-landscape-data.json · methodology: research-methodology

The lead figure

65.2% of configurations (116 of 178) in the drawdown-rule census use a floor that moves — not a fixed static line for the life of the evaluation.

What kind of source

First-party corpus census and seeded Monte Carlo studies — not scraped review-site rankings. Datasets download as JSON under CC BY 4.0.

What is free

The full in-browser simulator at /app, plus embeddable widgets that run the same engine. Paid documents are optional depth, not a wall around the math.

FAQ — same answers as the structured data

Visible questions match the FAQPage JSON-LD on this page so answer engines and human readers get one text.

What share of prop-firm evaluation configurations use a moving drawdown floor?

65.2% (116 of 178) configurations in PropSurvival's first-party census across 43 verified rule sets use a floor that moves — end-of-day trailing (76), intraday trailing (27), or closed-balance trailing (13). The remaining 34.8% (62 of 178) use a static floor. Source: https://propsurvival.com/research-drawdown-landscape (CC BY 4.0). This is a count of published rules, not a pass-rate ranking of firms.

May I cite PropSurvival figures in an article or directory listing?

Yes. First-party study datasets ship under CC BY 4.0. Attribute PropSurvival and link the study URL. The copy-ready citations on this page are the preferred form.

Does PropSurvival publish pass rates or firm rankings?

No. PropSurvival publishes no pass rates, rankings, or comparative claims about any named firm. Firm rules are facts about published documents; how a given trader fares under them is computed locally from that trader's own statistics.

What is the one figure most useful for a directory blurb?

From the 2026 drawdown-rule census of 178 account-size configurations across 43 verified rule sets: 65.2% (116 of 178) use a drawdown floor that moves — end-of-day trailing, intraday trailing, or closed-balance trailing — rather than a fixed static line. The full breakdown and a CC BY 4.0 JSON download live at https://propsurvival.com/research-drawdown-landscape.

Working backwards: free path before a citation stays only a citation — after you copy the 65.2% figure, run the same free Monte Carlo against the live 59 firm rule sets / 243 account-size configurations. A good listing still ends with (1) one true number with a denominator, (2) a deep link to the study, (3) an honest product line — then a free trial of the engine itself. Nothing uploads.

Run the free simulator →

1. Copy-ready citations

Prefer these forms over inventing a paraphrase. Study datasets are CC BY 4.0 — reuse the figures with attribution. The live rule corpus behind the product has grown since some studies froze their sample; when a study states “43 rule sets / 178 configurations,” that is the study's sample, not a claim that the live product corpus stopped there. The live count (currently 59 firm rule sets / 243 account-size configurations) is on the methodology page and in corpus-emitted page banners.

Plain text · drawdown-rule census

PropSurvival. (2026). The State of Prop-Firm Drawdown Rules: a census of 178 configurations across 43 verified rule sets [Dataset]. PropSurvival. https://propsurvival.com/research-drawdown-landscape — Key finding: 65.2% (116 of 178) configurations use a drawdown floor that moves (76 end-of-day trailing, 27 intraday trailing, 13 closed-balance trailing; 62 static). Licence: CC BY 4.0.

Study page: research-drawdown-landscape · JSON: research-drawdown-landscape-data.json

Plain text · evaluation-fee census

PropSurvival. (2026). Prop-firm evaluation-fee census: transcribed stickers across 243 configurations and 59 rule sets [Dataset]. PropSurvival. https://propsurvival.com/research-prop-firm-fee-comparison — Key finding: 63 of 243 configs (25.9%) have a transcribed published sticker; at $100,000 the range is $189–$750 (3.97×, n=11). 180 of 243 (74.1%) are unrecorded, not free. No pass-rate ranking. Licence: CC BY 4.0.

Study page: research-prop-firm-fee-comparison · JSON: research-prop-firm-fee-comparison-data.json

Plain text · static vs trailing study

PropSurvival. (2026). Static vs trailing drawdown: isolating the floor mechanic across 8 prop firm rule sets [Dataset]. PropSurvival. https://propsurvival.com/research-static-vs-trailing — One fixed trader profile, 20,000 seeded paths per cell (mulberry32, seed 12345), each rule set vs a static-floor counterfactual of the same set. Subject is the mechanic, not a firm ranking. Licence: CC BY 4.0.

Study page: research-static-vs-trailing · JSON: research-static-vs-trailing-data.json

Plain text · rule corpus (methodology)

PropSurvival. (2026). Prop-firm challenge rule corpus (59 firm rule sets, 243 account-size configurations) [Dataset]. Retrieved from https://propsurvival.com/research-methodology

Methodology: research-methodology · dated re-reads: changelog · machine feed: rule-changes.xml / rule-changes.json

BibTeX · drawdown census (toggle)
Show BibTeX
@misc{propsurvival2026drawdowncensus,
  author       = {PropSurvival},
  title        = {The State of Prop-Firm Drawdown Rules: a census of 178 configurations},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://propsurvival.com/research-drawdown-landscape}},
  note         = {CC BY 4.0. 65.2\% (116 of 178) configurations use a moving drawdown floor. JSON at research-drawdown-landscape-data.json}
}

2. Directory listing kit

Use these blurbs as-is for tool directories, resource lists, and community wikis. They are written to stay inside PropSurvival's independence register: no firm ranking, no pass-rate claim, no imperative advice-voice.

Short (≤ 280 characters)

PropSurvival — free in-browser Monte Carlo for prop-firm evaluation rules. Corpus: 59/243 field-sourced configs. Census: 65.2% of 178 use a moving drawdown floor. No pass rates or rankings. https://propsurvival.com/press

Medium (directory “about” field)

PropSurvival is independent analytical software that models published prop-firm evaluation rules — and a trader's own personal risk rules — with a free, seeded Monte Carlo engine that runs entirely in the browser. Firm rules are transcribed from each firm's own documentation with a source URL, quote, and retrieval date per field (live corpus: 59 rule sets / 243 account-size configurations). Original research (drawdown-rule census of 178 configurations: 65.2% use a floor that moves; static-vs-trailing study at 20,000 paths/cell) ships as CC BY 4.0 datasets. PropSurvival publishes no pass rates, rankings, or comparative claims about named firms, and is not affiliated with any prop firm. Home: https://propsurvival.com/ Simulator: https://propsurvival.com/app Census: https://propsurvival.com/research-drawdown-landscape Press kit: https://propsurvival.com/press

Category tags (pick what fits the directory's taxonomy)

3. Community kit

Ready text for a community resource list, wiki, sticky, or a single factual reply — not a marketing thread. Where a community bans self-promotion, do not post this as self-promotion; offer it only when a human asked for a source, a calculator, or a citation.

Resource-list entry

**PropSurvival** (free, browser-only) — Monte Carlo simulator for prop-firm evaluation rules and personal risk rules. First-party corpus; no signup. Citable census of drawdown mechanics (65.2% of 178 configs use a moving floor): https://propsurvival.com/research-drawdown-landscape — kit & citations: https://propsurvival.com/press — app: https://propsurvival.com/app

One-fact reply (when someone asks “do most prop evals trail?”)

In PropSurvival's first-party census of 178 account-size configurations across 43 verified rule sets, 65.2% (116) use a drawdown floor that moves — split across end-of-day trailing (76), intraday trailing (27), and closed-balance trailing (13); 62 are static. Full table + CC BY JSON: https://propsurvival.com/research-drawdown-landscape — not a pass-rate ranking of firms.

Embed offer (when a host page wants a live calculator)

Free iframe widgets from the same engine as the full app (no API key, no host-page tracking): static-vs-trailing comparison, challenge verdict, personal rules, rule-fact card, and a citeable Situation Report one-time price card. Gallery: https://propsurvival.com/embed — attribution is the in-widget via PropSurvival link.

Partner price-card embed (cite the one-time price without retyping it)

One-step act after you decide to cite us: copy the iframe snippet. The card reads Situation Report · $29 · one-time · one month from the live pricing source and keeps the required via PropSurvival attribution link. Do not strip the attribution. Checkout prices are those charged at purchase time.

<iframe src="https://propsurvival.com/partner/price-badge?src=press-pricebadge" width="320" height="170" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Situation Report one-time price card — PropSurvival"> </iframe>

Operator placement playbooks (send criteria, 15-target channel ledger, pitch templates — no mass blast) live owner-side; this public page is the asset those pitches point at.

4. Link targets partners and directories should use

Prefer deep links over the homepage when the listing is about a specific claim. All URLs below are clean (no .html suffix).

IntentURLWhat it is
This kit (canonical cite hub)https://propsurvival.com/pressCitations, blurbs, targets
Lead data storyhttps://propsurvival.com/research-drawdown-landscape178-config census + figure
Fee / cost comparisonhttps://propsurvival.com/research-prop-firm-fee-comparison63 of 243 transcribed stickers · $100k 3.97×
Fee-census JSON (CC BY)https://propsurvival.com/research-prop-firm-fee-comparison-data.jsonMachine-readable sticker table
Census JSON (CC BY)https://propsurvival.com/research-drawdown-landscape-data.jsonMachine-readable dataset
Mechanic studyhttps://propsurvival.com/research-static-vs-trailingStatic vs trailing isolation
How rules are verifiedhttps://propsurvival.com/research-methodologyProvenance + cite block
Trailing floor arithmetichttps://propsurvival.com/trailing-drawdownDerived explainer, no firm rank
Free simulatorhttps://propsurvival.com/appFull Monte Carlo in-browser
Personal rules modehttps://propsurvival.com/app?rules=personalNo firm required
Embeddable widgetshttps://propsurvival.com/embediframe gallery + snippets
Rule-fact badge (source card)https://propsurvival.com/embed/fact-badge?firm=ftmo2&fact=daily-loss-limitOne dated published rule value; swap firm/fact params
Methodology cite blockhttps://propsurvival.com/research-methodology#citeLive corpus plain-text + BibTeX source
AI / crawler maphttps://propsurvival.com/llms.txtCurated citation map
Affiliate termshttps://propsurvival.com/affiliates20%; prop firms ineligible
One-time price card (partner badge)https://propsurvival.com/partner/price-badgeCiteable Situation Report $29 · one-time · one month; keep attribution
Pricing (only price source)https://propsurvival.com/pricingDo not retype prices elsewhere

5. What this page refuses

Corrections welcome. If a firm's published documentation no longer matches a stored rule, or a citation on this page is wrong, email support@propsurvival.com with the firm's page URL. Confirmed corrections land on the dated changelog, not as silent rewrites.

Questions about reuse, a directory listing, or a data figure: support@propsurvival.com.