TradeDay — Verification Record
Quick Pay Intraday · Our recorded checks and their evidence. A corpus correction does not establish when a firm changed its rules.
Value stands · re-sourcing citation
looked · cited sentence not found at 14 URL(s)
Inspect the evidence or run your numbers
Run TradeDay in the simulator — freeCitation findings
The recorded source wording was not found at the following locations. This does not establish that the firm's rule changed.
- https://tradeday.freshdesk.com/ (the page has moved)
- https://tradeday.freshdesk.com/en/support/solutions/articles/103000008849-what-is-the-consistency-objective- (the cited passage is no longer on the page)
- https://tradeday.com/ (quote ok)
- https://tradeday.freshdesk.com/en/support/solutions/articles/103000008847-what-are-the-objectives-and-rules-of-the-quick-pay-and-fast-pass-evaluation- (quote ok)
- https://tradeday.freshdesk.com/en/support/solutions/articles/103000008848-what-is-the-profit-target-objective- (quote ok)
- https://tradeday.freshdesk.com/en/support/solutions/articles/103000008855-what-is-the-maximum-drawdown-rule- (quote ok)
- https://tradeday.freshdesk.com/en/support/solutions/articles/103000335937-quick-pay-funded-sim-payout-policy (quote ok)
- https://www.tradeday.com/ (unchanged)
- https://tradeday.freshdesk.com/en/support/solutions/articles/103000008889-what-are-the-rules-for-funded-funded-sim-and-funded-live-traders- (new rule page)
- https://tradeday.freshdesk.com/en/support/solutions/articles/103000008876-what-happens-if-i-fail-any-of-the-evaluation-challenge- (new rule page)
- https://tradeday.freshdesk.com/pt-PT/support/solutions/articles/103000008855-qual-%C3%A9-a-regra-de-drawdown-m%C3%A1ximo- (new rule page)
- https://tradeday.freshdesk.com/en/support/solutions/articles/103000411652-quick-pay-and-fast-pass-funded-live-trading-rules (new rule page)
- https://tradeday.freshdesk.com/en/support/solutions/articles/103000262630-how-do-i-request-a-payout-and-how-long-does-it-take- (quote ok)
- https://www.tradeday.com/terms-and-conditions (quote ok)
Dated source-check records
- Confirmed · sources disagree on 0 field(s)
Quick Pay Intraday · Normal corpus review current first party
USD 100,000 · USD 150,000 · USD 50,000 · recorded field scope; not a whole-plan verification
Manifest row 196; auto_promote:false; TradeDay help QuickPay30%/FastPass45% conflicts with homepage FastPass30%. Source also distinguishes bestday/totalPnL from target wording. Hold current generic consistency object. Scoped field review, not whole-plan acceptance. Held fields are deliberately absent from the confirmation map.
No prior value is evidenced for this check. This is a record of our research, not a firm rule effective date.
Sources recorded for this check:Link to this check
https://tradeday.freshdesk.com/en/support/solutions/articles/103000008849-what-is-the-consistency-objective- - Confirmed, no changes
Quick Pay Intraday · Normal corpus review current first party
USD 100,000 · USD 150,000 · USD 50,000 · recorded field scope; not a whole-plan verification
Field-by-field: 1 confirmed (1 field touched this pass).
Manifest row 199; auto_promote:false; Intraday evaluation accountcard target6%, per-sizeMLL andmonthlyfee model; QuickPay/FastPass help/homepage consistency andfreezeexample conflicts held.5days source versuscurrentnewproduct3days not blanketcertified; funded50/50below4k80/20above4k90/10live not universal50. Scoped field review, not whole-plan acceptance. Held fields are deliberately absent from the confirmation map.
payout profit split pct: confirmedNo prior value is evidenced for this check. This is a record of our research, not a firm rule effective date.
Sources recorded for this check:Link to this check
https://tradeday.com/ - Confirmed, no changes
Quick Pay Intraday · Normal corpus review current first party
USD 100,000 · recorded field scope; not a whole-plan verification
Field-by-field: 2 confirmed (2 fields touched this pass).
Manifest row 194; auto_promote:false; Intraday evaluation accountcard target6%, per-sizeMLL andmonthlyfee model; QuickPay/FastPass help/homepage consistency andfreezeexample conflicts held.5days source versuscurrentnewproduct3days not blanketcertified; funded50/50below4k80/20above4k90/10live not universal50. Scoped field review, not whole-plan acceptance. Held fields are deliberately absent from the confirmation map.
max drawdown amount pct: confirmed profit target pct: confirmedNo prior value is evidenced for this check. This is a record of our research, not a firm rule effective date.
Sources recorded for this check:Link to this check
https://tradeday.com/ - Confirmed, no changes
Quick Pay Intraday · Normal corpus review current first party
USD 100,000 · USD 150,000 · USD 50,000 · recorded field scope; not a whole-plan verification
Field-by-field: 1 confirmed (1 field touched this pass).
Manifest row 195; auto_promote:false; Intraday evaluation accountcard target6%, per-sizeMLL andmonthlyfee model; QuickPay/FastPass help/homepage consistency andfreezeexample conflicts held.5days source versuscurrentnewproduct3days not blanketcertified; funded50/50below4k80/20above4k90/10live not universal50. Scoped field review, not whole-plan acceptance. Held fields are deliberately absent from the confirmation map.
min trading days: confirmedNo prior value is evidenced for this check. This is a record of our research, not a firm rule effective date.
Sources recorded for this check:Link to this check
https://tradeday.freshdesk.com/en/support/solutions/articles/103000008847-what-are-the-objectives-and-rules-of-the-quick-pay-and-fast-pass-evaluation- - Confirmed, no changes
Quick Pay Intraday · Normal corpus review current first party
USD 100,000 · USD 150,000 · USD 50,000 · recorded field scope; not a whole-plan verification
Field-by-field: 2 confirmed (2 fields touched this pass).
Manifest row 197; auto_promote:false; Intraday evaluation accountcard target6%, per-sizeMLL andmonthlyfee model; QuickPay/FastPass help/homepage consistency andfreezeexample conflicts held.5days source versuscurrentnewproduct3days not blanketcertified; funded50/50below4k80/20above4k90/10live not universal50. Scoped field review, not whole-plan acceptance. Held fields are deliberately absent from the confirmation map.
max drawdown anchor: confirmed max drawdown type: confirmedNo prior value is evidenced for this check. This is a record of our research, not a firm rule effective date.
Sources recorded for this check:Link to this check
https://tradeday.freshdesk.com/en/support/solutions/articles/103000008855-what-is-the-maximum-drawdown-rule- - Confirmed · sources disagree on 0 field(s)
Quick Pay Intraday · Normal corpus review current first party
USD 100,000 · USD 150,000 · USD 50,000 · recorded field scope; not a whole-plan verification
Manifest row 198; auto_promote:false; TradeDay same page example passes EODfloor100500 despite prose freeze100000. Preserve source contradiction rather than choosing a freeze/phase silently. Scoped field review, not whole-plan acceptance. Held fields are deliberately absent from the confirmation map.
No prior value is evidenced for this check. This is a record of our research, not a firm rule effective date.
Sources recorded for this check:Link to this check
https://tradeday.freshdesk.com/en/support/solutions/articles/103000008855-what-is-the-maximum-drawdown-rule- - Documented absent
Quick Pay Intraday · First party single pass
USD 100,000 · USD 150,000 · USD 50,000 · recorded field scope; not a whole-plan verification
Field-by-field: 1 noted (1 field touched this pass).
trader-relations review CONCERNS: the $99 reset fee is well sourced from the Terms & Conditions, but that same T&C url was also cited as source_url for payout.cycle_days even though the note itself admitted that page does not discuss payout cadence -- not a payout-policy read. Re-sourced to TradeDay's own Quick Pay Funded Sim Payout Policy article (already this record's source for payout.min_payout, confirming product match) and its linked payout-request guide (fetched via r.jina.ai, 2026-09-13): both describe on-request payouts via the dashboard with a still-pending request simply overridden by a new one, and neither states a fixed interval. payout.cycle_days stays documented-absent; source_url no longer points at a page the note says doesn't cover the field.
payout cycle days: documented-absent (re-sourced to an on-topic payout page)No prior value is evidenced for this check. This is a record of our research, not a firm rule effective date.
Sources recorded for this check:Link to this check
https://tradeday.freshdesk.com/en/support/solutions/articles/103000335937-quick-pay-funded-sim-payout-policy
https://tradeday.freshdesk.com/en/support/solutions/articles/103000262630-how-do-i-request-a-payout-and-how-long-does-it-take- - Backfilled from archive
Quick Pay Intraday · First party single pass
USD 100,000 · USD 150,000 · USD 50,000 · recorded field scope; not a whole-plan verification
Field-by-field: 2 noted (2 fields touched this pass).
PKG-E payout/reset-fee provenance backfill. Reset fee $99 confirmed flat (not size-scaled) in TradeDay's own Terms & Conditions -- a legal document distinct from the promotional marketing price this record's existing reasoning already flagged as unstable. No fixed payout cycle interval is stated in the source examined; left null with a documented omission.
payout cycle days: documented-absent pricing reset price after breach: sourcedNo prior value is evidenced for this check. This is a record of our research, not a firm rule effective date.
Sources recorded for this check:Link to this check
https://www.tradeday.com/terms-and-conditions - Confirmed, no changes
Quick Pay Intraday · Live primary source recheck
USD 100,000 · USD 150,000 · USD 50,000 · recorded field scope; not a whole-plan verification
Field-by-field: 1 corrected · 6 noted (7 fields touched this pass).
Live primary-source recheck 2026-08-12: all material fields confirmed unchanged; both stored ambiguities (consistency denominator; split ladder) remain live verbatim; min_trading_days=5 now first-party-quoted (derived->sourced available).
payout min payout: confirmed (250) payout profit split pct: confirmed (50 entry tier; live homepage cards + payout article) consistency: confirmed (30%, raise_target; metric ambiguity still live verbatim) daily loss: confirmed (none — "just one rule") max drawdown: confirmed (trailing equity_intraday 4%/3%/3%, freeze at start) min trading days: confirmed (5; now has a first-party verbatim quote) profit target pct: confirmed (6% -> $3k/$6k/$9k per size)No prior value is evidenced for this check. This is a record of our research, not a firm rule effective date.
Link to this check - Confirmed · sources disagree on 2 field(s)
Quick Pay Intraday · Two independent readers, each working blind to the other’s output and to the stored value
USD 150,000 · recorded field scope; not a whole-plan verification
Field-by-field: 5 confirmed · 2 preserved for the record (7 fields touched this pass).
Two independent blind first-party readers covered TradeDay's Quick Pay Intraday evaluation across all three sold sizes (50k/100k/150k). AGREE: profit target $3,000/$6,000/$9,000 (6% of size, derived not separately published); trailing max drawdown $2,000/$3,000/$4,500 (4%/3%/3% of size, derived); trailing, intraday-calculated, anchored to the highest balance/equity ever reached, freezing once the floor reaches the original starting balance (corroborated end-to-end by TradeDay's own $100,000-account worked example -- no dedicated $150k numeric walkthrough exists, so this size's mechanic is carried from the general firm-wide text plus the $100k arithmetic proof); no separate daily loss limit exists at any size ('TradeDay has just one rule - Don't break the Maximum Drawdown Limit!'); min trading days 5 (both readers agree on the number, neither supplied a verbatim quote for it -- see reasoning on that field); consistency limit 30%, evaluation-stage only, effect raise_target not a fail condition. DISAGREE, RESOLVED VIA ambiguities[]: (a) the consistency rule's own denominator -- TradeDay's article states both a cumulative-total-profit ratio AND a fixed 30%-of-target dollar cap in the same piece; picked the cumulative-ratio reading as conservative (see ambiguities[] basis). (b) funded-stage profit split -- reader A found a detailed 50/50-then-80/20-then-90/10 tier ladder, reader B read a flat 80/20 marketing figure; stored the entry tier (50) as conservative. Neither disagreement is size-specific; the same resolution applies identically across all three sold sizes.
payout profit split pct: disagree consistency: disagree daily loss amount pct: confirmed max drawdown amount abs: confirmed max drawdown anchor: confirmed max drawdown type: confirmed profit target abs: confirmedNo prior value is evidenced for this check. This is a record of our research, not a firm rule effective date.
Sources recorded for this check:Link to this check
https://tradeday.com/
https://tradeday.freshdesk.com/en/support/solutions/articles/103000008847-what-are-the-objectives-and-rules-of-the-quick-pay-and-fast-pass-evaluation-
https://tradeday.freshdesk.com/en/support/solutions/articles/103000008855-what-is-the-maximum-drawdown-rule-
https://tradeday.freshdesk.com/en/support/solutions/articles/103000008849-what-is-the-consistency-objective-
https://tradeday.freshdesk.com/en/support/solutions/articles/103000335937-quick-pay-funded-sim-payout-policy - Confirmed · sources disagree on 2 field(s)
Quick Pay Intraday · Two independent readers, each working blind to the other’s output and to the stored value
USD 100,000 · recorded field scope; not a whole-plan verification
Field-by-field: 5 confirmed · 2 preserved for the record (7 fields touched this pass).
Two independent blind first-party readers covered TradeDay's Quick Pay Intraday evaluation across all three sold sizes (50k/100k/150k). AGREE: profit target $3,000/$6,000/$9,000 (6% of size, derived not separately published); trailing max drawdown $2,000/$3,000/$4,500 (4%/3%/3% of size, derived); trailing, intraday-calculated, anchored to the highest balance/equity ever reached, freezing once the floor reaches the original starting balance -- corroborated end-to-end for THIS $100,000 size by TradeDay's own worked example: floor opens at $97,000, ratchets to $98,000 on a purely intraday equity peak that is fully given back by close, holds through a losing day 2, then freezes at $100,000 once a day-3 intraday peak reaches $103,000; no separate daily loss limit exists at any size ('TradeDay has just one rule - Don't break the Maximum Drawdown Limit!'); min trading days 5 (both readers agree on the number, neither supplied a verbatim quote for it -- see reasoning on that field); consistency limit 30%, evaluation-stage only, effect raise_target not a fail condition. DISAGREE, RESOLVED VIA ambiguities[]: (a) the consistency rule's own denominator -- TradeDay's article states both a cumulative-total-profit ratio AND a fixed 30%-of-target dollar cap in the same piece; picked the cumulative-ratio reading as conservative (see ambiguities[] basis). (b) funded-stage profit split -- reader A found a detailed 50/50-then-80/20-then-90/10 tier ladder, reader B read a flat 80/20 marketing figure; stored the entry tier (50) as conservative. Neither disagreement is size-specific; the same resolution applies identically across all three sold sizes.
payout profit split pct: disagree consistency: disagree daily loss amount pct: confirmed max drawdown amount abs: confirmed max drawdown anchor: confirmed max drawdown type: confirmed profit target abs: confirmedNo prior value is evidenced for this check. This is a record of our research, not a firm rule effective date.
Sources recorded for this check:Link to this check
https://tradeday.com/
https://tradeday.freshdesk.com/en/support/solutions/articles/103000008847-what-are-the-objectives-and-rules-of-the-quick-pay-and-fast-pass-evaluation-
https://tradeday.freshdesk.com/en/support/solutions/articles/103000008855-what-is-the-maximum-drawdown-rule-
https://tradeday.freshdesk.com/en/support/solutions/articles/103000008849-what-is-the-consistency-objective-
https://tradeday.freshdesk.com/en/support/solutions/articles/103000335937-quick-pay-funded-sim-payout-policy - Confirmed · sources disagree on 2 field(s)
Quick Pay Intraday · Two independent readers, each working blind to the other’s output and to the stored value
USD 50,000 · recorded field scope; not a whole-plan verification
Field-by-field: 5 confirmed · 2 preserved for the record (7 fields touched this pass).
Two independent blind first-party readers covered TradeDay's Quick Pay Intraday evaluation across all three sold sizes (50k/100k/150k). AGREE: profit target $3,000/$6,000/$9,000 (6% of size, derived not separately published); trailing max drawdown $2,000/$3,000/$4,500 (4%/3%/3% of size, derived); trailing, intraday-calculated, anchored to the highest balance/equity ever reached, freezing once the floor reaches the original starting balance (corroborated end-to-end by TradeDay's own $100,000-account worked example: floor opens at $97,000, ratchets to $98,000 on a purely intraday equity peak that is fully given back by close, then freezes at $100,000 once a later intraday peak reaches $103,000); no separate daily loss limit exists at any size ('TradeDay has just one rule - Don't break the Maximum Drawdown Limit!'); min trading days 5 (both readers agree on the number, neither supplied a verbatim quote for it -- see reasoning on that field); consistency limit 30%, evaluation-stage only, effect raise_target not a fail condition. DISAGREE, RESOLVED VIA ambiguities[]: (a) the consistency rule's own denominator -- TradeDay's article states both a cumulative-total-profit ratio AND a fixed 30%-of-target dollar cap in the same piece; picked the cumulative-ratio reading as conservative (see ambiguities[] basis). (b) funded-stage profit split -- reader A found a detailed 50/50-then-80/20-then-90/10 tier ladder, reader B read a flat 80/20 marketing figure; stored the entry tier (50) as conservative. Neither disagreement is size-specific; the same resolution applies identically across all three sold sizes.
payout profit split pct: disagree consistency: disagree daily loss amount pct: confirmed max drawdown amount abs: confirmed max drawdown anchor: confirmed max drawdown type: confirmed profit target abs: confirmedNo prior value is evidenced for this check. This is a record of our research, not a firm rule effective date.
Sources recorded for this check:Link to this check
https://tradeday.com/
https://tradeday.freshdesk.com/en/support/solutions/articles/103000008847-what-are-the-objectives-and-rules-of-the-quick-pay-and-fast-pass-evaluation-
https://tradeday.freshdesk.com/en/support/solutions/articles/103000008848-what-is-the-profit-target-objective-
https://tradeday.freshdesk.com/en/support/solutions/articles/103000008855-what-is-the-maximum-drawdown-rule-
https://tradeday.freshdesk.com/en/support/solutions/articles/103000008849-what-is-the-consistency-objective-
https://tradeday.freshdesk.com/en/support/solutions/articles/103000335937-quick-pay-funded-sim-payout-policy
Earlier record links
These retained links open the complete size and program membership of the earlier grouped record. Each distinct check now has its own link.
2026-10-04 · earlier grouped record
- Quick Pay Intraday · sizes 50000, 100000, 150000 — inspect this distinct check
- Quick Pay Intraday · sizes 50000, 100000, 150000 — inspect this distinct check
- Quick Pay Intraday · sizes 50000, 100000, 150000 — inspect this distinct check
- Quick Pay Intraday · sizes 50000, 100000, 150000 — inspect this distinct check
- Quick Pay Intraday · sizes 50000, 100000, 150000 — inspect this distinct check
- Quick Pay Intraday · sizes 100000 — inspect this distinct check
2026-09-13 · earlier grouped record
2026-09-13 · earlier grouped record
2026-08-12 · earlier grouped record
2026-07-30 · earlier grouped record
What the rules say now
profit target pct (same across all modelled sizes)
Profit Target $3,000 (pricing card, 50k Intraday) on a $50,000 account -- 6% is this corpus's derived ratio ($3,000 / $50,000), not itself a separately published percentage; neither blind reader found a first-party sentence stating a bare '6%' figure.retrieved derived
min trading days (same across all modelled sizes)
Trade for a minimum of 5 trading daysretrieved derived
daily loss amount pct (same across all modelled sizes)
TradeDay has just one rule - Don't break the Maximum Drawdown Limit!retrieved sourced
max drawdown amount pct
Trailing Max Drawdown $2,000 (calculated Intraday) -- 4% is this corpus's derived ratio ($2,000 / $50,000); neither reader found a separately published percentage figure for this size.retrieved derived
Intraday 100k $ 240 $ 108 per month Profit Target $6,000 Trailing Max Drawdown $3,000 (calculated Intraday)retrieved derived
Trailing Max Drawdown $4,500 (calculated Intraday) -- 3% is this corpus's derived ratio ($4,500 / $150,000); neither reader found a separately published percentage figure for this size.retrieved derived
max drawdown type (same across all modelled sizes)
the trailing maximum drawdown doesnretrieved sourced
max drawdown basis (same across all modelled sizes)
Trailing Max Drawdown $2,000 (calculated Intraday)retrieved sourced
max drawdown locks (same across all modelled sizes)
Trailing max drawdown limits continues to trail your account growth until they reach the starting account balance, at which time the trailing drawdown will freeze and no longer trail. Corroborated by the firm's own $100,000-account worked example: 'the TMD will be set at $97,000. When you have an account balance of $103,000 your TMD will be at $100,000 where it freezes.'retrieved sourced
consistency (same across all modelled sizes)
Objective 3: Be consistent in your profitability. No day greater than 30% of your total profits. ... If you have a profitable day in excess of the consistency percentage of your profit target you do not fail the evaluation (but your profit target does increase).retrieved sourced
Rules and their verification status change without notice; the firm's own documentation is always the final authority. This page is independent research, not investment or trading advice, and PropSurvival is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by TradeDay.