Skip to content
PropSurvival
Run your analysisRun analysis — free
Menu
Verification Record

The Trading Pit — Verification Record

Latest recorded check: · 11 recorded checks

Futures Prime · Our recorded checks and their evidence. A corpus correction does not establish when a firm changed its rules.

Value stands · re-sourcing citation

looked · cited sentence not found at 40 URL(s)

Inspect citation findings

Inspect the evidence or run your numbers

Run The Trading Pit in the simulator — free

Citation findings

The recorded source wording was not found at the following locations. This does not establish that the firm's rule changed.

Dated source-check records

  • Confirmed, no changes

    Futures Prime · Normal corpus review current first party

    USD 100,000 · USD 150,000 · USD 50,000 · recorded field scope; not a whole-plan verification

    Field-by-field: 1 confirmed (1 field touched this pass).

    Manifest row 171; auto_promote:false; FuturesPrime50/100/150k, dailyPAUSE equity softsessionhalt notfail; min3trade days,EODbalanceDDfreezesinitial. Excluded175consistency source404 remainsheld; no fullfirmfreshness. Scoped field review, not whole-plan acceptance. Held fields are deliberately absent from the confirmation map.

    max drawdown basis: confirmed

    No prior value is evidenced for this check. This is a record of our research, not a firm rule effective date.

    Sources recorded for this check:
    https://www.thetradingpit.com/futures
    Link to this check
  • Confirmed, no changes

    Futures Prime · Normal corpus review current first party

    USD 100,000 · USD 150,000 · USD 50,000 · recorded field scope; not a whole-plan verification

    Field-by-field: 2 confirmed (2 fields touched this pass).

    Manifest row 174; auto_promote:false; FuturesPrime50/100/150k, dailyPAUSE equity softsessionhalt notfail; min3trade days,EODbalanceDDfreezesinitial. Excluded175consistency source404 remainsheld; no fullfirmfreshness. Scoped field review, not whole-plan acceptance. Held fields are deliberately absent from the confirmation map.

    max drawdown anchor: confirmed max drawdown locks: confirmed

    No prior value is evidenced for this check. This is a record of our research, not a firm rule effective date.

    Sources recorded for this check:
    https://support.thetradingpit.com/what-is-max-drawdown-trailing-on-eod-end-of-day-balance?hsLang=en
    Link to this check
  • Confirmed, no changes

    Futures Prime · Normal corpus review current first party

    USD 100,000 · recorded field scope; not a whole-plan verification

    Field-by-field: 1 confirmed (1 field touched this pass).

    Manifest row 170; auto_promote:false; FuturesPrime50/100/150k, dailyPAUSE equity softsessionhalt notfail; min3trade days,EODbalanceDDfreezesinitial. Excluded175consistency source404 remainsheld; no fullfirmfreshness. Scoped field review, not whole-plan acceptance. Held fields are deliberately absent from the confirmation map.

    daily loss amount abs: confirmed

    No prior value is evidenced for this check. This is a record of our research, not a firm rule effective date.

    Sources recorded for this check:
    https://www.thetradingpit.com/futures
    Link to this check
  • Confirmed, no changes

    Futures Prime · Normal corpus review current first party

    USD 100,000 · USD 150,000 · USD 50,000 · recorded field scope; not a whole-plan verification

    Field-by-field: 1 confirmed (1 field touched this pass).

    Manifest row 172; auto_promote:false; FuturesPrime50/100/150k, dailyPAUSE equity softsessionhalt notfail; min3trade days,EODbalanceDDfreezesinitial. Excluded175consistency source404 remainsheld; no fullfirmfreshness. Scoped field review, not whole-plan acceptance. Held fields are deliberately absent from the confirmation map.

    min trading days: confirmed

    No prior value is evidenced for this check. This is a record of our research, not a firm rule effective date.

    Sources recorded for this check:
    https://support.thetradingpit.com/what-is-the-minimum-profitable-days-requirement-for-the-cfds-prime-challenge-0-0-0
    Link to this check
  • Confirmed, no changes

    Futures Prime · Normal corpus review current first party

    USD 100,000 · USD 150,000 · USD 50,000 · recorded field scope; not a whole-plan verification

    Field-by-field: 2 confirmed (2 fields touched this pass).

    Manifest row 173; auto_promote:false; FuturesPrime50/100/150k, dailyPAUSE equity softsessionhalt notfail; min3trade days,EODbalanceDDfreezesinitial. Excluded175consistency source404 remainsheld; no fullfirmfreshness. Scoped field review, not whole-plan acceptance. Held fields are deliberately absent from the confirmation map.

    daily loss amount basis: confirmed daily loss includes unrealized: confirmed

    No prior value is evidenced for this check. This is a record of our research, not a firm rule effective date.

    Sources recorded for this check:
    https://support.thetradingpit.com/how-does-the-daily-pause-work-on-futures-prime-accounts
    Link to this check
  • Confirmed, no changes

    Futures Prime · Normal corpus review current first party

    USD 50,000 · recorded field scope; not a whole-plan verification

    Field-by-field: 1 confirmed (1 field touched this pass).

    Manifest row 176; auto_promote:false; FuturesPrime50/100/150k, dailyPAUSE equity softsessionhalt notfail; min3trade days,EODbalanceDDfreezesinitial. Excluded175consistency source404 remainsheld; no fullfirmfreshness. Scoped field review, not whole-plan acceptance. Held fields are deliberately absent from the confirmation map.

    profit target abs: confirmed

    No prior value is evidenced for this check. This is a record of our research, not a firm rule effective date.

    Sources recorded for this check:
    https://www.thetradingpit.com/futures
    Link to this check
  • Documented absent

    Futures Prime · First party single pass

    USD 100,000 · USD 150,000 · USD 50,000 · recorded field scope; not a whole-plan verification

    Field-by-field: 1 noted (1 field touched this pass).

    trader-relations review CONCERNS: cycle_days correctly stayed null, but the omission bracketed the "current" policy as "2026-03-06 through 2026-07-13", leaving a newly modeled account today (2026-09-13) in neither bucket the note described. Fetched (r.jina.ai) the cited page directly: its own page title is "Futures Prime Reward Old Policy" and it explicitly scopes that second tier to "Accounts created between March 6, 2026 and July 13, 2026" -- i.e. the page itself says it is superseded. Found and fetched the firm's actual current article, "Futures Prime Reward New Policy" (support.thetradingpit.com/futures-prime-reward-new-policy, open-ended from 2026-07-13, amended 2026-07-27 per its own dated update note): same performance-gated shape (5 winning $200+/day trading days for the first reward, $0.01+ net profit since last payout for subsequent ones), still no fixed calendar interval. Re-sourced source_url to the current article; cycle_days stays documented-absent, now describing the actual live policy rather than a range the firm's own page says ended two months ago.

    payout cycle days: documented-absent (re-sourced off the page the firm itself now labels an old, superseded policy)

    No prior value is evidenced for this check. This is a record of our research, not a firm rule effective date.

    Sources recorded for this check:
    https://support.thetradingpit.com/futures-prime-reward-new-policy
    https://support.thetradingpit.com/futures-prime-payout-policy
    Link to this check
  • Documented absent

    Futures Prime · First party single pass

    USD 100,000 · USD 150,000 · USD 50,000 · recorded field scope; not a whole-plan verification

    Field-by-field: 1 noted (1 field touched this pass).

    PKG-E payout/reset-fee provenance backfill. Futures Prime reward cadence is performance-gated under the current (2026-03-06+) policy, not a fixed day interval; a legacy 7-day cycle applied only to pre-2026-03-06 accounts. Left null with a documented omission rather than asserting either figure.

    payout cycle days: documented-absent

    No prior value is evidenced for this check. This is a record of our research, not a firm rule effective date.

    Sources recorded for this check:
    https://support.thetradingpit.com/futures-prime-payout-policy
    Link to this check
  • Confirmed · sources disagree on 4 field(s)

    Futures Prime · Two independent readers, each working blind to the other’s output and to the stored value

    USD 100,000 · recorded field scope; not a whole-plan verification

    Field-by-field: 10 confirmed · 4 preserved for the record (14 fields touched this pass).

    Two independent blind readers agree on every dollar figure ($6,000 target / $2,000 daily / $3,000 max DD at this $100,000 'Most Popular' tier), the trailing-EOD max-drawdown mechanic with a starting-balance lock, the 40%-of-target current consistency rule, the 3-unique-trading-day minimum, and the 80% profit split. DISAGREE (resolved, not left as ambiguities[] noise): (a) profit_target_pct and daily_loss.amount_pct — null vs a derived percentage; both derived here with high confidence (exact, consistent ratio across all 3 sizes). (b) daily_loss.reset_time_utc — same firm-wide 16:05-vs-16:15-CT conflict as the $50,000 tier, resolved the same way; see ambiguities[]. This corpus models the flagship, storefront-featured 'Futures Prime' 1-phase product only; 'Futures Classic' was deliberately not sourced. Scoped to rules/the-trading-pit/ only; corpus-sync.js --write and the shared-surface gate/verify pass are owed separately.

    consistency: confirmed daily loss amount abs: confirmed daily loss amount pct: disagree daily loss basis: confirmed daily loss on breach: confirmed daily loss reset time utc: disagree max drawdown amount abs: confirmed max drawdown amount pct: disagree max drawdown anchor: confirmed max drawdown basis: confirmed max drawdown locks: confirmed min trading days: confirmed profit target abs: confirmed profit target pct: disagree

    No prior value is evidenced for this check. This is a record of our research, not a firm rule effective date.

    Sources recorded for this check:
    https://www.thetradingpit.com/futures
    https://support.thetradingpit.com/how-does-the-daily-pause-work-on-futures-prime-accounts
    https://support.thetradingpit.com/what-is-max-drawdown-trailing-on-eod-end-of-day-balance?hsLang=en
    https://support.thetradingpit.com/latest-40-consistency-policy-for-futures-prime-challenges
    https://www.thetradingpit.com/trading-rules
    https://support.thetradingpit.com/what-is-the-minimum-profitable-days-requirement-for-the-cfds-prime-challenge-0-0-0
    Link to this check
  • Confirmed · sources disagree on 4 field(s)

    Futures Prime · Two independent readers, each working blind to the other’s output and to the stored value

    USD 50,000 · recorded field scope; not a whole-plan verification

    Field-by-field: 10 confirmed · 4 preserved for the record (14 fields touched this pass).

    Two independent blind readers agree on every dollar figure ($3,000 target / $1,000 daily / $2,000 max DD at this $50,000 tier), the trailing-EOD max-drawdown mechanic with a starting-balance lock, the 40%-of-target consistency rule (current, post-14-July-2026 policy; a superseded pre-14-July additive formula was also found and deliberately not used), the 3-unique-trading-day minimum, and the 80% profit split. DISAGREE (resolved, not left as ambiguities[] noise): (a) profit_target_pct and daily_loss.amount_pct — one reader left these null (firm states only dollars), the other computed a percentage; both derived here with high confidence since the ratio is exact and consistent across all 3 sold sizes. (b) daily_loss.reset_time_utc — a genuine two-source clock-time conflict (16:05 CT pause-lift vs 16:15 CT limit-recalculation), resolved to the recalculation event (16:15 CT) as the one matching this field's semantics; see ambiguities[]. NOT modeled as a disagreement: max_drawdown.includes_unrealized (no firm-specific statement either way; set true to match every other balance_eod firm in this corpus — see provenance reasoning) and the daily_loss basis firm self-contradiction one reader flagged (an uncited third article allegedly saying 'EOD balance' instead of equity) — not citable, so recorded as a caveat, not an ambiguity. This corpus models The Trading Pit's flagship, storefront-featured 'Futures Prime' 1-phase product only; the firm's separate 'Futures Classic' (1- or 2-phase, help-center-only, not on the public storefront) was deliberately NOT sourced or modeled here. This rules/the-trading-pit/ pass is scoped to this directory only per the assigning task; corpus-sync.js --write, ops.js ingest, and the shared-surface gate/verify pass are owed separately and were not run from this workflow.

    consistency: confirmed daily loss amount abs: confirmed daily loss amount pct: disagree daily loss basis: confirmed daily loss on breach: confirmed daily loss reset time utc: disagree max drawdown amount abs: confirmed max drawdown amount pct: disagree max drawdown anchor: confirmed max drawdown basis: confirmed max drawdown locks: confirmed min trading days: confirmed profit target abs: confirmed profit target pct: disagree

    No prior value is evidenced for this check. This is a record of our research, not a firm rule effective date.

    Sources recorded for this check:
    https://www.thetradingpit.com/futures
    https://support.thetradingpit.com/how-does-the-daily-pause-work-on-futures-prime-accounts
    https://support.thetradingpit.com/what-is-max-drawdown-trailing-on-eod-end-of-day-balance?hsLang=en
    https://support.thetradingpit.com/latest-40-consistency-policy-for-futures-prime-challenges
    https://www.thetradingpit.com/trading-rules
    https://support.thetradingpit.com/what-is-the-minimum-profitable-days-requirement-for-the-cfds-prime-challenge-0-0-0
    Link to this check
  • Confirmed · sources disagree on 4 field(s)

    Futures Prime · Two independent readers, each working blind to the other’s output and to the stored value

    USD 150,000 · recorded field scope; not a whole-plan verification

    Field-by-field: 10 confirmed · 4 preserved for the record (14 fields touched this pass).

    Two independent blind readers agree on every dollar figure ($9,000 target / $3,000 daily / $4,500 max DD at this $150,000 tier), the trailing-EOD max-drawdown mechanic with a starting-balance lock, the 40%-of-target current consistency rule, the 3-unique-trading-day minimum, and the 80% profit split. DISAGREE (resolved, not left as ambiguities[] noise): (a) profit_target_pct and daily_loss.amount_pct — null vs a derived percentage; both derived here with high confidence (exact, consistent ratio across all 3 sizes). (b) daily_loss.reset_time_utc — same firm-wide 16:05-vs-16:15-CT conflict as the other two tiers, resolved the same way; see ambiguities[]. This corpus models the flagship, storefront-featured 'Futures Prime' 1-phase product only; 'Futures Classic' was deliberately not sourced. Scoped to rules/the-trading-pit/ only; corpus-sync.js --write and the shared-surface gate/verify pass are owed separately.

    consistency: confirmed daily loss amount abs: confirmed daily loss amount pct: disagree daily loss basis: confirmed daily loss on breach: confirmed daily loss reset time utc: disagree max drawdown amount abs: confirmed max drawdown amount pct: disagree max drawdown anchor: confirmed max drawdown basis: confirmed max drawdown locks: confirmed min trading days: confirmed profit target abs: confirmed profit target pct: disagree

    No prior value is evidenced for this check. This is a record of our research, not a firm rule effective date.

    Sources recorded for this check:
    https://www.thetradingpit.com/futures
    https://support.thetradingpit.com/how-does-the-daily-pause-work-on-futures-prime-accounts
    https://support.thetradingpit.com/what-is-max-drawdown-trailing-on-eod-end-of-day-balance?hsLang=en
    https://support.thetradingpit.com/latest-40-consistency-policy-for-futures-prime-challenges
    https://www.thetradingpit.com/trading-rules
    https://support.thetradingpit.com/what-is-the-minimum-profitable-days-requirement-for-the-cfds-prime-challenge-0-0-0
    Link to this check

Earlier record links

These retained links open the complete size and program membership of the earlier grouped record. Each distinct check now has its own link.

2026-10-04 · earlier grouped record

2026-09-13 · earlier grouped record

2026-09-13 · earlier grouped record

2026-07-30 · earlier grouped record

What the rules say now

profit target pct (same across all modelled sizes)

All sizes6

No directly quotable clause for this figure — PropSurvival’s corpus works it out from profit target abs / account size instead.

retrieved derived

min trading days (same across all modelled sizes)

All sizes3
you must place a trade for a minimum of 3
retrieved sourced

daily loss amount pct (same across all modelled sizes)

All sizes2

No directly quotable clause for this figure — PropSurvival’s corpus works it out from daily loss amount abs / account size instead.

retrieved derived

max drawdown amount pct

500004

No directly quotable clause for this figure — PropSurvival’s corpus works it out from maximum drawdown amount abs / account size instead.

retrieved derived
1000003

No directly quotable clause for this figure — PropSurvival’s corpus works it out from maximum drawdown amount abs / account size instead.

retrieved derived
1500003

No directly quotable clause for this figure — PropSurvival’s corpus works it out from maximum drawdown amount abs / account size instead.

retrieved derived

max drawdown type (same across all modelled sizes)

All sizestrailing
Your maximum drawdown will trail based on your End-Of-Day (EOD) balance until it reaches your starting balance, after which it will remain fixed at the starting balance amount.
retrieved sourced

max drawdown basis (same across all modelled sizes)

All sizesend-of-day balance
Your maximum drawdown will trail based on your End-Of-Day (EOD) balance
retrieved sourced

max drawdown locks (same across all modelled sizes)

All sizes[object Object]
The trailing Max Drawdown stops once it reaches the starting balance.
retrieved sourced

consistency (same across all modelled sizes)

All sizes[object Object]
The information below applies to new Futures Prime accounts created on or after 14 July 2026. The profit from your highest trading day must not exceed 40% of your total profit target. If your highest trading day exceeds this threshold, you will not fail the Challenge. Instead, your profit target will automatically increase so that your highest trading day represents exactly 40% of the adjusted profit target. ... Original Profit Target: $3,000 ... If the profit from your highest trading day is $1,500: You do not fail ... Your new profit target becomes: $1,500 / 0.40 = $3,750.
retrieved sourced

Rules and their verification status change without notice; the firm's own documentation is always the final authority. This page is independent research, not investment or trading advice, and PropSurvival is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by The Trading Pit.