The Trading Pit — Verification Record

This is the complete, dated record of every independent verification pass this corpus has run against The Trading Pit's own published rules, beyond the initial read: what was checked, what the check found, what changed, and what was preserved for the record even where two readings disagreed. See how a number gets checked twice for the method behind every entry below.

• 2026-09-13 Documented-absent

  First party single pass

  Field-by-field: 1 noted (1 field touched this pass).

  PKG-E payout/reset-fee provenance backfill. Futures Prime reward cadence is performance-gated under the current (2026-03-06+) policy, not a fixed day interval; a legacy 7-day cycle applied only to pre-2026-03-06 accounts. Left null with a documented omission rather than asserting either figure.

  Sources consulted: https://support.thetradingpit.com/futures-prime-payout-policy — checked 2026-09-13
• 2026-09-13 Documented-absent

  First party single pass

  Field-by-field: 1 noted (1 field touched this pass).

  trader-relations review CONCERNS: payout cycle (days) correctly stayed null, but the omission bracketed the "current" policy as "2026-03-06 through 2026-07-13", leaving a newly modeled account today (2026-09-13) in neither bucket the note described. Fetched (r jina ai) the cited page directly: its own page title is "Futures Prime Reward Old Policy" and it explicitly scopes that second tier to "Accounts created between March 6, 2026 and July 13, 2026" -- i e. the page itself says it is superseded. Found and fetched the firm's actual current article, "Futures Prime Reward New Policy" (support thetradingpit com/futures-prime-reward-new-policy, open-ended from 2026-07-13, amended 2026-07-27 per its own dated update note): same performance-gated shape (5 winning $200+/day trading days for the first reward, $0.01+ net profit since last payout for subsequent ones), still no fixed calendar interval. Re-sourced source url to the current article; payout cycle (days) stays documented-absent, now describing the actual live policy rather than a range the firm's own page says ended two months ago.

  Sources consulted: https://support.thetradingpit.com/futures-prime-reward-new-policy, https://support.thetradingpit.com/futures-prime-payout-policy — checked 2026-09-13
• 2026-07-30 Confirmed, items preserved for the record

  Two independent readers, each working blind to the other’s output and to the stored value

  Field-by-field: 10 confirmed · 4 preserved for the record (14 fields touched this pass).

  Two independent blind readers agree on every dollar figure ($3,000 target / $1,000 daily / $2,000 max DD at this $50,000 tier), the trailing-EOD max-drawdown mechanic with a starting-balance lock, the 40%-of-target consistency rule (current, post-14-July-2026 policy; a superseded pre-14-July additive formula was also found and deliberately not used), the 3-unique-trading-day minimum, and the 80% profit split. DISAGREE (resolved, not left as ambiguities[] noise): (a) profit target and daily loss amount (%) — one reader left these null (firm states only dollars), the other computed a percentage; both derived here with high confidence since the ratio is exact and consistent across all 3 sold sizes. (b) daily loss daily reset time — a genuine two-source clock-time conflict (16:05 CT pause-lift vs 16:15 CT limit-recalculation), resolved to the recalculation event (16:15 CT) as the one matching this field's semantics; see ambiguities[]. NOT modeled as a disagreement: maximum drawdown includes unrealized P&L (no firm-specific statement either way; set true to match every other end-of-day balance firm in this corpus — see provenance reasoning) and the daily loss basis firm self-contradiction one reader flagged (an uncited third article allegedly saying 'EOD balance' instead of equity) — not citable, so recorded as a caveat, not an ambiguity. This corpus models The Trading Pit's flagship, storefront-featured 'Futures Prime' 1-phase product only; the firm's separate 'Futures Classic' (1- or 2-phase, help-center-only, not on the public storefront) was deliberately NOT sourced or modeled here. This pass is scoped to this directory only per the assigning task; corpus-sync js --write, ops js ingest, and the shared-surface gate/verify pass are owed separately and were not run from this workflow.

  Sources consulted: https://www.thetradingpit.com/futures, https://support.thetradingpit.com/how-does-the-daily-pause-work-on-futures-prime-accounts, https://support.thetradingpit.com/what-is-max-drawdown-trailing-on-eod-end-of-day-balance?hsLang=en, https://support.thetradingpit.com/latest-40-consistency-policy-for-futures-prime-challenges, https://www.thetradingpit.com/trading-rules, https://support.thetradingpit.com/what-is-the-minimum-profitable-days-requirement-for-the-cfds-prime-challenge-0-0-0 — checked 2026-07-30

Rules and their verification status change without notice; the firm's own documentation is always the final authority. This page is independent research, not investment or trading advice, and PropSurvival is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by The Trading Pit.