OneUp Trader — Verification Record
1-Step Evaluation · Our recorded checks and their evidence. A corpus correction does not establish when a firm changed its rules.
Confirmed unchanged
looked · found
Inspect the evidence or run your numbers
Run OneUp Trader in the simulator — freeDated source-check records
- Confirmed · sources disagree on 1 field(s)
1-Step Evaluation · Two independent readers, each working blind to the other’s output and to the stored value
100,000 (currency not recorded) · 150,000 (currency not recorded) · 25,000 (currency not recorded) · 250,000 (currency not recorded) · 50,000 (currency not recorded) · recorded field scope; not a whole-plan verification
Field-by-field: 10 confirmed · 2 preserved for the record · 1 noted (13 fields touched this pass).
Merged from two independent blind first-party reads (both via oneuptrader.com + help.oneuptrader.com). AGREE (all 5 sizes): profit target is a clean 6% of account size at every tier ($1,500/$3,000/$6,000/$9,000/$15,000 at 25K/50K/100K/150K/250K) - unlike most firms in this corpus, OneUp's target ladder is a flat percentage. NO daily loss limit at all, any size, any stage ("No Daily Loss Limit" on every tier of the root pricing page; corroborated by a dedicated article - the firm removed it firm-wide on 2023-02-09 and it is still absent on the live 2026 pricing page). Max drawdown is TRAILING, ratchets up only on new Account-Balance highs, never decreases on a balance dip, and PERMANENTLY FREEZES once it reaches the account's initial starting balance ("Once your Trailing Drawdown reaches your initial starting balance, it will not change for the rest of your evaluation") - confirmed independently by the firm's own $100,000-account worked-example chart, which shows the drawdown line flattening exactly at $100,000 from Day 6 onward while the balance series keeps making new highs. Per-size drawdown amounts ($1,500/$2,500/$3,500/$5,000/$5,500) are NOT a flat percentage (6%/5%/3.5%/3.3333%/2.2%) - a live example of why a per-size ladder must never be interpolated from one size. Min trading days = 10 (both reads agree on the figure; neither captured a verbatim excerpt for this specific field - see the min_trading_days provenance entry). Funded profit split = 90%, first $10,000 of funded profit kept 100% by the trader. A real, sourced consistency rule exists ("three (3) other best trading days' net profits must sum to >=80% of the largest day's net profit", worked example: best day $1,000, threshold $800, three other days $400+$300+$240=$940, passes) but it is a FLOOR on the sum of three OTHER days relative to the best day, not the M2 schema's only supported consistency shape (best_day_pct_of_total_profit / effect:block, a CAP on the best day's share of TOTAL profit) - the two mechanics are not interchangeable, and forcing this rule into the cap shape at limit:80 would assert a bar roughly 25 points laxer than reality. Recorded as consistency:[] (unmodeled, not absent) rather than fabricate a wrong reading; revisit if the schema gains a floor-style metric. A second first-party page (article 468) phrases the same rule without the word "other" ("any 3 trading days"), a firm-side wording inconsistency, flagged not resolved. DISAGREE (citation-only, not substantive - both readers describe the identical mechanic and numbers, differing only in which exact page/URL/paraphrase they cited): profit_target/daily_loss/max_drawdown quote wording and URL (root pricing page vs #pricebox anchor vs help-center mechanic articles - all describe the same live figures). GENUINE UNRESOLVED AMBIGUITY (both readers independently flag the same gap): whether unrealized/open floating P&L is what triggers a real-time breach of the trailing floor, or only realized (closed-trade) Account Balance is tested - neither reader found a first-party sentence settling this; the only adjacent hint (Rithmic R|Trader's 'Auto Liquidate Threshold Value') is a platform risk-tool cross-reference, not a firm statement of calculation basis. Recorded conservatively as includes_unrealized:true (assume floating losses count - never overstate ease of passing) and modelled as a live ambiguities[] entry. Separately noted, not modelled in this schema: a real recurring-subscription pricing structure (50% of the monthly fee at sign-up, 50% as an 'activation fee' once the evaluation is passed) with per-tier monthly prices ($65/$75/$150/$175/$325 at 25K/50K/100K/150K/250K) and an activation-fee dollar figure confirmed ONLY for 25K ($65) and 50K ($75) - the 100K/150K/250K activation fees are described only as following 'the same split-payment structure' with no dollar figure given, so per the no-interpolation rule they are not recorded here. Articles referenced by the readers by number/title only, with no full URL captured in this findings set (388 'Funded Trader Trailing Drawdown', 385 'Evaluation Rules & Parameters', 372 'Funded Trader Rules'), are named in field notes above but are not cited as a source_url.
payout profit split pct: confirmed consistency: confirmed (rule text); schema-shape mismatch, not encoded daily loss amount pct: confirmed max drawdown amount pct: confirmed max drawdown anchor: confirmed max drawdown evaluation frequency: confirmed max drawdown includes unrealized: disagree max drawdown locks: confirmed max drawdown type: confirmed min trading days: confirmed profit target abs: confirmed profit target pct: confirmed profit target quote/url citation choice: disagree (citation-only, not substantive)No prior value is evidenced for this check. This is a record of our research, not a firm rule effective date.
Sources recorded for this check:Link to this check
https://www.oneuptrader.com/
https://www.oneuptrader.com/#pricebox
https://help.oneuptrader.com/article/468-most-popular-questions
https://help.oneuptrader.com/article/389-rules-definitions
https://help.oneuptrader.com/article/486-no-more-daily-loss-limit-restrictions
https://help.oneuptrader.com/article/387-what-are-the-rules-of-the-evaluation
https://help.oneuptrader.com/article/365-steps-to-getting-funded
https://help.oneuptrader.com/article/376-profit-info
https://help.oneuptrader.com/article/371-how-does-the-billing-work
Earlier record links
These retained links open the complete size and program membership of the earlier grouped record. Each distinct check now has its own link.
2026-07-30 · earlier grouped record
What the rules say now
profit target pct (same across all modelled sizes)
"$1,500 Profit Target" (root pricing page, $25,000 tier tab, raw HTML verified). Same figure independently reached via the #pricebox-anchored view of the same page.retrieved sourced
min trading days (same across all modelled sizes)
10 minimum trading days to complete the Evaluation. Both independent reads agree on this figure; this findings set did not carry a verbatim excerpt for this specific field (see rechecks note) - recorded from the evaluation-rules article both reads cite for the surrounding evaluation mechanics.retrieved sourced
daily loss amount pct (same across all modelled sizes)
"No Daily Loss Limit" (root pricing page, listed inside every account-size tier block, including $25,000). Corroborated by the dedicated article: "Release date: February 9th, 2023 ... we've made the decision to remove the daily loss limit from both Evaluation & Funded accounts" - still reflected on the live 2026 pricing page for every tier. Also FAQ: "Is there a daily loss limit on the accounts? No, there is no daily loss limit amount on both the evaluation and funded accounts. Trade with complete freedom and maximize your profit potential." (https://help.oneuptrader.com/article/468-most-popular-questions)retrieved sourced
max drawdown amount pct
"$1,500 Trailing Drawdown" (root pricing page, $25,000 tier tab). Amount is fixed-dollar per tier, not a flat percentage (6%/5%/3.5%/3.3333%/2.2% across 25K-250K) - do not interpolate across sizes.retrieved sourced
"$2,500 Trailing Drawdown" (root pricing page, $50,000 tier tab). Amount is fixed-dollar per tier, not a flat percentage (6%/5%/3.5%/3.3333%/2.2% across 25K-250K) - do not interpolate across sizes.retrieved sourced
"$3,500 Trailing Drawdown" (root pricing page, $100,000 tier tab). Amount is fixed-dollar per tier, not a flat percentage (6%/5%/3.5%/3.3333%/2.2% across 25K-250K) - do not interpolate across sizes.retrieved sourced
"$5,000 Trailing Drawdown" (root pricing page, $150,000 tier tab). Amount is fixed-dollar per tier, not a flat percentage (6%/5%/3.5%/3.3333%/2.2% across 25K-250K) - do not interpolate across sizes.retrieved sourced
"$5,500 Trailing Drawdown" (root pricing page, $250,000 tier tab). Amount is fixed-dollar per tier, not a flat percentage (6%/5%/3.5%/3.3333%/2.2% across 25K-250K) - do not interpolate across sizes.retrieved sourced
max drawdown type (same across all modelled sizes)
"The Trailing Drawdown will increase a defined distance as your account balance increases... If your balance decreases, then your Trailing Drawdown does not change."retrieved sourced
max drawdown basis (same across all modelled sizes)
"The Trailing Drawdown is calculated in Real-Time during your trading day" / "...calculated in real-time during your trading session and it includes simulated commissions and fees." (evaluation-phase article 389; the funded-phase twin, article 388 "Funded Trader Trailing Drawdown", states the identical real-time mechanic and is the article illustrated with the $100,000-account worked-example chart used for this corpus's reconciliation vector.)retrieved derived
max drawdown locks (same across all modelled sizes)
"Once your Trailing Drawdown reaches your initial starting balance, it will not change for the rest of your evaluation." Corroborated by the firm's own $100,000-account worked-example chart (articles 389/388), which shows the drawdown line flattening exactly at the $100,000 starting balance from Day 6 onward while the balance series keeps climbing (to roughly $106,450-$108,900 by Day 7-10).retrieved sourced
consistency (same across all modelled sizes)
"Traders must have three (3) other best trading days' net profits total summed up to equal 80% or more of the largest day's net profit." Worked example given: best day $1,000; 80% threshold = $800; three other days $400+$300+$240=$940 (passes, >$800). Stated evaluation-stage only (articles 385/387/389); not present in the raw text of the Funded Trader Rules core page (article 372) among the pages fetched. A second first-party page (article 468, Most Popular Questions) states the same rule omitting the word "other" ("any 3 trading days' net profits total summed up to 80% or more of the largest day's net profit") - a firm-side wording inconsistency, flagged not resolved.retrieved sourced
Rules and their verification status change without notice; the firm's own documentation is always the final authority. This page is independent research, not investment or trading advice, and PropSurvival is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by OneUp Trader.