Skip to content
PropSurvival
Verification Record

Goat Funded Trader — Verification Record

Latest recorded check: · 12 recorded checks

GOAT (1-Step Challenge) · Our recorded checks and their evidence. A corpus correction does not establish when a firm changed its rules.

Value stands · re-sourcing citation

looked · cited sentence not found at 3 URL(s)

Inspect citation findings

Citation findings

The recorded source wording was not found at the following locations. This does not establish that the firm's rule changed.

Dated source-check records

  • Confirmed · sources disagree on 0 field(s)

    GOAT (1-Step Challenge) — the account carrying the "Most Popular" badge among GFT's evaluation lineup on the firm's own /model comparison page (competing products: 2-Step Standard, 2-Step PRO, 2-Step GOAT/"Goat Blitz", 3-Step "HERO", several Instant Funding variants, "Goat 1$", and "Pay Later"). Treated as flagship per the firm's own designation, not a third-party claim. · Normal corpus review current first party

    USD 10,000 · USD 100,000 · USD 15,000 · USD 150,000 · USD 200,000 · USD 2,500 · USD 25,000 · USD 250,000 · USD 300,000 · USD 400,000 · USD 5,000 · USD 50,000 · USD 8,000 · recorded field scope; not a whole-plan verification

    Manifest row 128; auto_promote:false; GOAT default80% and100% add-on are distinct selectable options; script-backed marketing parameter is not proof of every purchased account split. Preserve pricing/SKU/choice caveat. Scoped field review, not whole-plan acceptance. Held fields are deliberately absent from the confirmation map.

    No prior value is evidenced for this check. This is a record of our research, not a firm rule effective date.

    Sources recorded for this check:
    https://www.goatfundedtrader.com/model
    Link to this check
  • Confirmed, no changes

    GOAT (1-Step Challenge) — the account carrying the "Most Popular" badge among GFT's evaluation lineup on the firm's own /model comparison page (competing products: 2-Step Standard, 2-Step PRO, 2-Step GOAT/"Goat Blitz", 3-Step "HERO", several Instant Funding variants, "Goat 1$", and "Pay Later"). Treated as flagship per the firm's own designation, not a third-party claim. · Normal corpus review current first party

    USD 10,000 · USD 100,000 · USD 15,000 · USD 150,000 · USD 200,000 · USD 2,500 · USD 25,000 · USD 250,000 · USD 300,000 · USD 400,000 · USD 5,000 · USD 50,000 · USD 8,000 · recorded field scope; not a whole-plan verification

    Field-by-field: 1 confirmed (1 field touched this pass).

    Manifest row 125; auto_promote:false; CFD1Step target10%/3validdays;Aug1+daily3% versusprior4% existinginertdatequalification preserved. Higher balance/equity and5PMEST basisheld;6%staticinitial, no evaluation consistency;80%default/100%addon not universal. Scoped field review, not whole-plan acceptance. Held fields are deliberately absent from the confirmation map.

    daily loss on breach: confirmed

    No prior value is evidenced for this check. This is a record of our research, not a firm rule effective date.

    Link to this check
  • Confirmed, no changes

    GOAT (1-Step Challenge) — the account carrying the "Most Popular" badge among GFT's evaluation lineup on the firm's own /model comparison page (competing products: 2-Step Standard, 2-Step PRO, 2-Step GOAT/"Goat Blitz", 3-Step "HERO", several Instant Funding variants, "Goat 1$", and "Pay Later"). Treated as flagship per the firm's own designation, not a third-party claim. · Normal corpus review current first party

    USD 10,000 · USD 100,000 · USD 15,000 · USD 150,000 · USD 200,000 · USD 2,500 · USD 25,000 · USD 250,000 · USD 300,000 · USD 400,000 · USD 5,000 · USD 50,000 · USD 8,000 · recorded field scope; not a whole-plan verification

    Manifest row 129; auto_promote:false; CFD1Step target10%/3validdays;Aug1+daily3% versusprior4% existinginertdatequalification preserved. Higher balance/equity and5PMEST basisheld;6%staticinitial, no evaluation consistency;80%default/100%addon not universal. Scoped field review, not whole-plan acceptance. Held fields are deliberately absent from the confirmation map.

    No prior value is evidenced for this check. This is a record of our research, not a firm rule effective date.

    Sources recorded for this check:
    https://www.goatfundedtrader.com/model
    Link to this check
  • Confirmed, no changes

    GOAT (1-Step Challenge) — the account carrying the "Most Popular" badge among GFT's evaluation lineup on the firm's own /model comparison page (competing products: 2-Step Standard, 2-Step PRO, 2-Step GOAT/"Goat Blitz", 3-Step "HERO", several Instant Funding variants, "Goat 1$", and "Pay Later"). Treated as flagship per the firm's own designation, not a third-party claim. · Normal corpus review current first party

    USD 10,000 · USD 100,000 · USD 15,000 · USD 150,000 · USD 200,000 · USD 2,500 · USD 25,000 · USD 250,000 · USD 300,000 · USD 400,000 · USD 5,000 · USD 50,000 · USD 8,000 · recorded field scope; not a whole-plan verification

    Field-by-field: 1 confirmed (1 field touched this pass).

    Manifest row 127; auto_promote:false; CFD1Step target10%/3validdays;Aug1+daily3% versusprior4% existinginertdatequalification preserved. Higher balance/equity and5PMEST basisheld;6%staticinitial, no evaluation consistency;80%default/100%addon not universal. Scoped field review, not whole-plan acceptance. Held fields are deliberately absent from the confirmation map.

    consistency: confirmed

    No prior value is evidenced for this check. This is a record of our research, not a firm rule effective date.

    Link to this check
  • Confirmed · sources disagree on 0 field(s)

    GOAT (1-Step Challenge) — the account carrying the "Most Popular" badge among GFT's evaluation lineup on the firm's own /model comparison page (competing products: 2-Step Standard, 2-Step PRO, 2-Step GOAT/"Goat Blitz", 3-Step "HERO", several Instant Funding variants, "Goat 1$", and "Pay Later"). Treated as flagship per the firm's own designation, not a third-party claim. · Normal corpus review current first party

    USD 10,000 · USD 100,000 · USD 15,000 · USD 150,000 · USD 200,000 · USD 2,500 · USD 25,000 · USD 250,000 · USD 300,000 · USD 400,000 · USD 5,000 · USD 50,000 · USD 8,000 · recorded field scope; not a whole-plan verification

    Manifest row 124; auto_promote:false; GOAT1Step starts from higher(balance,equity) at5PMEST, not balance-only; current3% applies purchasesfromAug1, grandfather4% preserved. Stored22:00UTC does not resolve DST wording. Hold grouped basis/reset fields. Scoped field review, not whole-plan acceptance. Held fields are deliberately absent from the confirmation map.

    No prior value is evidenced for this check. This is a record of our research, not a firm rule effective date.

    Link to this check
  • Confirmed, no changes

    GOAT (1-Step Challenge) — the account carrying the "Most Popular" badge among GFT's evaluation lineup on the firm's own /model comparison page (competing products: 2-Step Standard, 2-Step PRO, 2-Step GOAT/"Goat Blitz", 3-Step "HERO", several Instant Funding variants, "Goat 1$", and "Pay Later"). Treated as flagship per the firm's own designation, not a third-party claim. · Normal corpus review current first party

    USD 10,000 · USD 100,000 · USD 15,000 · USD 150,000 · USD 200,000 · USD 2,500 · USD 25,000 · USD 250,000 · USD 300,000 · USD 400,000 · USD 5,000 · USD 50,000 · USD 8,000 · recorded field scope; not a whole-plan verification

    Field-by-field: 1 confirmed (1 field touched this pass).

    Manifest row 123; auto_promote:false; CFD1Step target10%/3validdays;Aug1+daily3% versusprior4% existinginertdatequalification preserved. Higher balance/equity and5PMEST basisheld;6%staticinitial, no evaluation consistency;80%default/100%addon not universal. Scoped field review, not whole-plan acceptance. Held fields are deliberately absent from the confirmation map.

    daily loss amount pct: confirmed

    No prior value is evidenced for this check. This is a record of our research, not a firm rule effective date.

    Link to this check
  • Confirmed, no changes

    GOAT (1-Step Challenge) — the account carrying the "Most Popular" badge among GFT's evaluation lineup on the firm's own /model comparison page (competing products: 2-Step Standard, 2-Step PRO, 2-Step GOAT/"Goat Blitz", 3-Step "HERO", several Instant Funding variants, "Goat 1$", and "Pay Later"). Treated as flagship per the firm's own designation, not a third-party claim. · Normal corpus review current first party

    USD 10,000 · USD 100,000 · USD 15,000 · USD 150,000 · USD 200,000 · USD 2,500 · USD 25,000 · USD 250,000 · USD 300,000 · USD 400,000 · USD 5,000 · USD 50,000 · USD 8,000 · recorded field scope; not a whole-plan verification

    Field-by-field: 5 confirmed (5 fields touched this pass).

    Manifest row 126; auto_promote:false; CFD1Step target10%/3validdays;Aug1+daily3% versusprior4% existinginertdatequalification preserved. Higher balance/equity and5PMEST basisheld;6%staticinitial, no evaluation consistency;80%default/100%addon not universal. Scoped field review, not whole-plan acceptance. Held fields are deliberately absent from the confirmation map.

    max drawdown amount pct: confirmed max drawdown anchor: confirmed max drawdown basis: confirmed max drawdown includes unrealized: confirmed max drawdown type: confirmed

    No prior value is evidenced for this check. This is a record of our research, not a firm rule effective date.

    Link to this check
  • Confirmed, no changes

    GOAT (1-Step Challenge) — the account carrying the "Most Popular" badge among GFT's evaluation lineup on the firm's own /model comparison page (competing products: 2-Step Standard, 2-Step PRO, 2-Step GOAT/"Goat Blitz", 3-Step "HERO", several Instant Funding variants, "Goat 1$", and "Pay Later"). Treated as flagship per the firm's own designation, not a third-party claim. · Normal corpus review current first party

    USD 10,000 · USD 100,000 · USD 15,000 · USD 150,000 · USD 200,000 · USD 2,500 · USD 25,000 · USD 250,000 · USD 300,000 · USD 400,000 · USD 5,000 · USD 50,000 · USD 8,000 · recorded field scope; not a whole-plan verification

    Field-by-field: 1 confirmed (1 field touched this pass).

    Manifest row 122; auto_promote:false; CFD1Step target10%/3validdays;Aug1+daily3% versusprior4% existinginertdatequalification preserved. Higher balance/equity and5PMEST basisheld;6%staticinitial, no evaluation consistency;80%default/100%addon not universal. Scoped field review, not whole-plan acceptance. Held fields are deliberately absent from the confirmation map.

    min trading days: confirmed

    No prior value is evidenced for this check. This is a record of our research, not a firm rule effective date.

    Link to this check
  • Confirmed, no changes

    GOAT (1-Step Challenge) — the account carrying the "Most Popular" badge among GFT's evaluation lineup on the firm's own /model comparison page (competing products: 2-Step Standard, 2-Step PRO, 2-Step GOAT/"Goat Blitz", 3-Step "HERO", several Instant Funding variants, "Goat 1$", and "Pay Later"). Treated as flagship per the firm's own designation, not a third-party claim. · Normal corpus review current first party

    USD 10,000 · USD 100,000 · USD 15,000 · USD 150,000 · USD 200,000 · USD 2,500 · USD 25,000 · USD 250,000 · USD 300,000 · USD 400,000 · USD 5,000 · USD 50,000 · USD 8,000 · recorded field scope; not a whole-plan verification

    Field-by-field: 1 confirmed (1 field touched this pass).

    Manifest row 121; auto_promote:false; CFD1Step target10%/3validdays;Aug1+daily3% versusprior4% existinginertdatequalification preserved. Higher balance/equity and5PMEST basisheld;6%staticinitial, no evaluation consistency;80%default/100%addon not universal. Scoped field review, not whole-plan acceptance. Held fields are deliberately absent from the confirmation map.

    profit target pct: confirmed

    No prior value is evidenced for this check. This is a record of our research, not a firm rule effective date.

    Link to this check
  • Recorded value changed on re-read

    GOAT (1-Step Challenge) — the account carrying the "Most Popular" badge among GFT's evaluation lineup on the firm's own /model comparison page (competing products: 2-Step Standard, 2-Step PRO, 2-Step GOAT/"Goat Blitz", 3-Step "HERO", several Instant Funding variants, "Goat 1$", and "Pay Later"). Treated as flagship per the firm's own designation, not a third-party claim. · Live primary source recheck

    USD 10,000 · USD 100,000 · USD 15,000 · USD 150,000 · USD 200,000 · USD 2,500 · USD 25,000 · USD 250,000 · USD 300,000 · USD 400,000 · USD 5,000 · USD 50,000 · USD 8,000 · recorded field scope; not a whole-plan verification

    Field-by-field: 6 confirmed · 2 corrected · 1 noted (9 fields touched this pass).

    Live primary-source re-check of the GOAT 1-Step model help-center article. FOUND CHANGED: Daily Drawdown Limit 4% -> 3% for accounts purchased from 2026-08-01 onward (pre-2026-08-01 grandfathered at 4%); amount_abs recomputed to 3% of each account size. NEWLY SOURCED: payout.cycle_days = 14 ('Payout Cycle: Bi-weekly (Every 14 days)'). RE-CONFIRMED UNCHANGED: profit target 10%, min trading days 3, profit split 80%, static max drawdown 6%, max_drawdown.type static, daily on_breach fail, reset 5:00 PM EST. The firm's /model marketing table still lags at 4%; the dated help-center article is controlling.

    payout cycle days: sourced 14 payout profit split pct: confirmed daily loss amount abs: changed daily loss amount pct: changed 4->3 (accts from 2026-08-01) daily loss on breach: confirmed max drawdown amount pct: confirmed max drawdown type: confirmed min trading days: confirmed profit target pct: confirmed

    daily loss amount abs · USD 10,000
    Previous value unavailable — More than one commit could carry this check; a previous value is not established.

    daily loss amount pct · USD 10,000
    Previous value unavailable — More than one commit could carry this check; a previous value is not established.

    daily loss amount abs · USD 100,000
    Previous value unavailable — More than one commit could carry this check; a previous value is not established.

    daily loss amount pct · USD 100,000
    Previous value unavailable — More than one commit could carry this check; a previous value is not established.

    daily loss amount abs · USD 15,000
    Previous value unavailable — More than one commit could carry this check; a previous value is not established.

    daily loss amount pct · USD 15,000
    Previous value unavailable — More than one commit could carry this check; a previous value is not established.

    daily loss amount abs · USD 150,000
    Previous value unavailable — More than one commit could carry this check; a previous value is not established.

    daily loss amount pct · USD 150,000
    Previous value unavailable — More than one commit could carry this check; a previous value is not established.

    daily loss amount abs · USD 200,000
    Previous value unavailable — More than one commit could carry this check; a previous value is not established.

    daily loss amount pct · USD 200,000
    Previous value unavailable — More than one commit could carry this check; a previous value is not established.

    daily loss amount abs · USD 2,500
    Previous value unavailable — More than one commit could carry this check; a previous value is not established.

    daily loss amount pct · USD 2,500
    Previous value unavailable — More than one commit could carry this check; a previous value is not established.

    daily loss amount abs · USD 25,000
    Previous value unavailable — More than one commit could carry this check; a previous value is not established.

    daily loss amount pct · USD 25,000
    Previous value unavailable — More than one commit could carry this check; a previous value is not established.

    daily loss amount abs · USD 250,000
    Previous value unavailable — More than one commit could carry this check; a previous value is not established.

    daily loss amount pct · USD 250,000
    Previous value unavailable — More than one commit could carry this check; a previous value is not established.

    daily loss amount abs · USD 300,000
    Previous value unavailable — More than one commit could carry this check; a previous value is not established.

    daily loss amount pct · USD 300,000
    Previous value unavailable — More than one commit could carry this check; a previous value is not established.

    daily loss amount abs · USD 400,000
    Previous value unavailable — More than one commit could carry this check; a previous value is not established.

    daily loss amount pct · USD 400,000
    Previous value unavailable — More than one commit could carry this check; a previous value is not established.

    daily loss amount abs · USD 5,000
    Previous value unavailable — More than one commit could carry this check; a previous value is not established.

    daily loss amount pct · USD 5,000
    Previous value unavailable — More than one commit could carry this check; a previous value is not established.

    daily loss amount abs · USD 50,000
    Previous value unavailable — More than one commit could carry this check; a previous value is not established.

    daily loss amount pct · USD 50,000
    Previous value unavailable — More than one commit could carry this check; a previous value is not established.

    daily loss amount abs · USD 8,000
    Previous value unavailable — More than one commit could carry this check; a previous value is not established.

    daily loss amount pct · USD 8,000
    Previous value unavailable — More than one commit could carry this check; a previous value is not established.

    Link to this check
  • Confirmed, no changes

    GOAT (1-Step Challenge) — the account carrying the "Most Popular" badge among GFT's evaluation lineup on the firm's own /model comparison page (competing products: 2-Step Standard, 2-Step PRO, 2-Step GOAT/"Goat Blitz", 3-Step "HERO", several Instant Funding variants, "Goat 1$", and "Pay Later"). Treated as flagship per the firm's own designation, not a third-party claim. · Two independent readers, each working blind to the other’s output and to the stored value

    USD 10,000 · USD 15,000 · USD 150,000 · USD 200,000 · USD 2,500 · USD 25,000 · USD 250,000 · USD 300,000 · USD 400,000 · USD 5,000 · USD 50,000 · USD 8,000 · recorded field scope; not a whole-plan verification

    Field-by-field: 14 confirmed (14 fields touched this pass).

    Two independent blind readers sourced the GOAT 1-Step Challenge model (the firm's own "Most Popular" badge among its evaluation lineup, per /model). CONFIRMED across every size in the ladder ($2,500 through $400,000): 10% profit target, 4% Daily Drawdown Limit (dynamic — recomputed each day as 4% of the higher of the prior day's balance or equity, snapshotted at 5:00 PM EST, NOT a fixed dollar amount off the initial balance), 6% Max Overall Loss (static, anchored to initial/starting capital, never trails upward, "must never drop below 94% of your starting capital"), immediate account closure on either hard breach, 3 minimum trading days, NO consistency/best-day rule at either the Evaluation or Funded stage, 80% profit split. The two readers' quote TEXT differed in wording at several fields (profit_target, daily_loss_basis, daily_loss_on_breach, max_drawdown_basis/anchor/locks, consistency) but the underlying VALUES agreed in every case — evaluated field-by-field and judged genuine agreement, not conflict, per this corpus's own >=2-distinct-candidates rule for ambiguities[]; none of those wording-only differences were promoted to ambiguities[] (see each field's provenance.reasoning for the specific judgment call). The $100,000 size's own worked examples were used to hand-derive this firm's golden vector (rules/goat-funded-trader/golden/): the Max Overall Loss worked example ("$100,000 X 6% = $6,000, $100,000 - $6,000 = $94,000") is clean and internally consistent; the companion Daily Drawdown Limit worked example on the same page ("Threshold = ($107,000 x 4%) = $4,280, $107,000 - $4000 = $102,720") is internally arithmetic-inconsistent as published ($4,280 vs $4,000) and uses illustrative $105K/$107K figures outside this account-size ladder, so it was NOT used as a golden-vector source (reported in provenance for completeness only).

    payout profit split pct: confirmed consistency: confirmed daily loss amount basis: confirmed daily loss amount pct: confirmed daily loss includes unrealized: confirmed daily loss on breach: confirmed max drawdown amount pct: confirmed max drawdown anchor: confirmed max drawdown basis: confirmed max drawdown includes unrealized: confirmed max drawdown locks: confirmed max drawdown type: confirmed min trading days: confirmed profit target pct: confirmed

    No prior value is evidenced for this check. This is a record of our research, not a firm rule effective date.

    Link to this check
  • Confirmed · sources disagree on 1 field(s)

    GOAT (1-Step Challenge) — the account carrying the "Most Popular" badge among GFT's evaluation lineup on the firm's own /model comparison page (competing products: 2-Step Standard, 2-Step PRO, 2-Step GOAT/"Goat Blitz", 3-Step "HERO", several Instant Funding variants, "Goat 1$", and "Pay Later"). Treated as flagship per the firm's own designation, not a third-party claim. · Two independent readers, each working blind to the other’s output and to the stored value

    USD 100,000 · recorded field scope; not a whole-plan verification

    Field-by-field: 14 confirmed · 1 preserved for the record (15 fields touched this pass).

    Two independent blind readers sourced the GOAT 1-Step Challenge model (the firm's own "Most Popular" badge among its evaluation lineup, per /model). CONFIRMED across every size in the ladder ($2,500 through $400,000): 10% profit target, 4% Daily Drawdown Limit (dynamic — recomputed each day as 4% of the higher of the prior day's balance or equity, snapshotted at 5:00 PM EST, NOT a fixed dollar amount off the initial balance), 6% Max Overall Loss (static, anchored to initial/starting capital, never trails upward, "must never drop below 94% of your starting capital"), immediate account closure on either hard breach, 3 minimum trading days, NO consistency/best-day rule at either the Evaluation or Funded stage, 80% profit split. The two readers' quote TEXT differed in wording at several fields (profit_target, daily_loss_basis, daily_loss_on_breach, max_drawdown_basis/anchor/locks, consistency) but the underlying VALUES agreed in every case — evaluated field-by-field and judged genuine agreement, not conflict, per this corpus's own >=2-distinct-candidates rule for ambiguities[]; none of those wording-only differences were promoted to ambiguities[] (see each field's provenance.reasoning for the specific judgment call). The $100,000 size's own worked examples were used to hand-derive this firm's golden vector (rules/goat-funded-trader/golden/): the Max Overall Loss worked example ("$100,000 X 6% = $6,000, $100,000 - $6,000 = $94,000") is clean and internally consistent; the companion Daily Drawdown Limit worked example on the same page ("Threshold = ($107,000 x 4%) = $4,280, $107,000 - $4000 = $102,720") is internally arithmetic-inconsistent as published ($4,280 vs $4,000) and uses illustrative $105K/$107K figures outside this account-size ladder, so it was NOT used as a golden-vector source (reported in provenance for completeness only). GENUINE DISAGREEMENT (entered as ambiguities[]), scoped to this $100K size only: pricing.initial_fee — two independent fetches of the same /model page row for this exact product returned two different promo prices ($263 then $503, against two different struck-through list prices $438 then $838), consistent with live/dynamic promo-code pricing rather than a stable list price; no other size in the ladder yielded any extractable price at all. pricing.initial_fee is left null in the schema (as at every other size); the observed figures are recorded in ambiguities[] rather than picked silently.

    payout profit split pct: confirmed consistency: confirmed daily loss amount basis: confirmed daily loss amount pct: confirmed daily loss includes unrealized: confirmed daily loss on breach: confirmed max drawdown amount pct: confirmed max drawdown anchor: confirmed max drawdown basis: confirmed max drawdown includes unrealized: confirmed max drawdown locks: confirmed max drawdown type: confirmed min trading days: confirmed profit target pct: confirmed pricing initial fee: disagree

    No prior value is evidenced for this check. This is a record of our research, not a firm rule effective date.

    Link to this check

Earlier record links

These retained links open the complete size and program membership of the earlier grouped record. Each distinct check now has its own link.

2026-10-04 · earlier grouped record

2026-08-12 · earlier grouped record

2026-07-31 · earlier grouped record

What the rules say now

profit target pct (same across all modelled sizes)

All sizes10
Achieve a 10% profit target
retrieved sourced

min trading days (same across all modelled sizes)

All sizes3
Complete at least 3 valid trading days
retrieved sourced

daily loss amount pct (same across all modelled sizes)

All sizes3
the Daily Drawdown Limit is 3% instead of 4%.
retrieved sourced

max drawdown amount pct (same across all modelled sizes)

All sizes6
This is your Absolute Floor. Your account equity or balance must never drop below 94% of your starting capital.
retrieved sourced

max drawdown type (same across all modelled sizes)

All sizesstatic
This is your Absolute Floor. Your account equity or balance must never drop below 94% of your starting capital.
retrieved sourced

max drawdown basis (same across all modelled sizes)

All sizesintraday equity (open positions included)
This is your Absolute Floor. Your account equity or balance must never drop below 94% of your starting capital.
retrieved sourced

max drawdown locks

2500null
Static floor — "does not trail or move ... for the life of the account" (no ratchet, hence no lock level to state).
retrieved sourced
5000null
Static floor — "does not trail or move ... for the life of the account" (no ratchet, hence no lock level to state).
retrieved sourced
8000null
Static floor — "does not trail or move ... for the life of the account" (no ratchet, hence no lock level to state).
retrieved sourced
10000null
Static floor — "does not trail or move ... for the life of the account" (no ratchet, hence no lock level to state).
retrieved sourced
15000null
Static floor — "does not trail or move ... for the life of the account" (no ratchet, hence no lock level to state).
retrieved sourced
25000null
Static floor — "does not trail or move ... for the life of the account" (no ratchet, hence no lock level to state).
retrieved sourced
50000null
Static floor — "does not trail or move ... for the life of the account" (no ratchet, hence no lock level to state).
retrieved sourced
100000null
Static floor — "does not trail or move ... for the life of the account" (no ratchet, hence no lock level to state).
retrieved sourced
150000null
Static floor — "does not trail or move ... for the life of the account" (no ratchet, hence no lock level to state).
retrieved sourced
200000null
Static floor — "does not trail or move ... for the life of the account" (no ratchet, hence no lock level to state).
retrieved sourced
250000null
Static floor — "does not trail or move ... for the life of the account" (no ratchet, hence no lock level to state).
retrieved sourced
300000null
Static floor — "does not trail or move ... for the life of the account" (no ratchet, hence no lock level to state).
retrieved sourced
400000null
Static floor — "does not trail or move ... for the life of the account" (no ratchet, hence no lock level to state).
retrieved sourced

consistency (same across all modelled sizes)

All sizes
Consistency Rule No No
retrieved sourced

Rules and their verification status change without notice; the firm's own documentation is always the final authority. This page is independent research, not investment or trading advice, and PropSurvival is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Goat Funded Trader.