Skip to content
PropSurvival
Verification Record

Fintokei — Verification Record

Latest recorded check: · 4 recorded checks

ProTrader (2-Step) · Our recorded checks and their evidence. A corpus correction does not establish when a firm changed its rules.

Value stands · re-sourcing citation

looked · cited sentence not found at 18 URL(s)

Inspect citation findings

Citation findings

The recorded source wording was not found at the following locations. This does not establish that the firm's rule changed.

Dated source-check records

  • Confirmed, no changes

    ProTrader (2-Step) · Normal corpus review current first party

    USD 10,000 · USD 100,000 · USD 20,000 · USD 200,000 · USD 5,000 · USD 50,000 · recorded field scope; not a whole-plan verification

    Field-by-field: 2 confirmed (2 fields touched this pass).

    Manifest row 74; auto_promote:false; ProTrader static10%initial; daily5%midnightUTC equity baseline mismatch held; ProTrader80% and per-size fee source kept separate from StartTrader/SwiftTrader. Scoped field review, not whole-plan acceptance. Held fields are deliberately absent from the confirmation map.

    max drawdown amount pct: confirmed max drawdown type: confirmed

    No prior value is evidenced for this check. This is a record of our research, not a firm rule effective date.

    Link to this check
  • Confirmed · sources disagree on 0 field(s)

    ProTrader (2-Step) · Normal corpus review current first party

    USD 10,000 · USD 100,000 · USD 20,000 · USD 200,000 · USD 5,000 · USD 50,000 · recorded field scope; not a whole-plan verification

    Manifest row 73; auto_promote:false; ProTrader5% daily limit uses midnightUTC equity, not balance-only amount basis.00:00UTC is supported but grouped basis is held; no engine/math change. Scoped field review, not whole-plan acceptance. Held fields are deliberately absent from the confirmation map.

    No prior value is evidenced for this check. This is a record of our research, not a firm rule effective date.

    Link to this check
  • Confirmed · sources disagree on 0 field(s)

    ProTrader (2-Step) · Normal corpus review current first party

    USD 100,000 · recorded field scope; not a whole-plan verification

    Manifest row 75; auto_promote:false; Current ProTrader80% split and listed per-size fees are supported; selected100K$549 alone cannot certify every historical account size (including5000). Pricing/SKU values unchanged. Scoped field review, not whole-plan acceptance. Held fields are deliberately absent from the confirmation map.

    No prior value is evidenced for this check. This is a record of our research, not a firm rule effective date.

    Sources recorded for this check:
    https://www.fintokei.com/protrader/
    Link to this check
  • Confirmed · resolution noted

    ProTrader (2-Step) · Two independent readers, each working blind to the other’s output and to the stored value

    USD 10,000 · USD 100,000 · USD 20,000 · USD 200,000 · USD 5,000 · USD 50,000 · recorded field scope; not a whole-plan verification

    Field-by-field: 10 confirmed · 2 noted (12 fields touched this pass).

    Two independent first-party readers (pass A / pass B) were merged upstream of this run; every numeric field showed a disagreement between them (profit target, daily loss %, max drawdown %, pricing model/split). This run added a THIRD independent check: a live re-fetch (2026-07-31) of both readers' cited URLs. That re-fetch resolved every one of THOSE disagreements as a PRODUCT-MISMATCH, not a real ambiguity -- pass B's entire figure set was sourced from https://fintokei.com/swifttrader/, the page for SwiftTrader (a distinct, single-phase, beginner/fast-trader Fintokei product explicitly out of scope for this ProTrader corpus), while pass A's figures were ProTrader-specific and were independently reconfirmed on https://www.fintokei.com/protrader/, https://support.fintokei.com/en/articles/6538822, and https://www.fintokei.com/programs/ (all consistent: 8%/6% targets, 5% daily / 10% max loss, 80% split, $49-$2,599 fee ladder, min 3 / max unlimited trading days). No ambiguities[] entries were created for those fields because the merge policy requires >=2 candidates answering the SAME question, and pass B's candidates answer a different product's question. Separately, this run's own additional research (not from the original two passes) surfaced ONE genuine same-product split https://www.fintokei.com/protrader/ and https://support.fintokei.com/en/articles/6538822 both say "3 trading days"; https://www.fintokei.com/programs/ says "3 profitable days" on the ProTrader row specifically (its other 3 product rows all say "trading days") -- entered as a genuine ambiguities[] entry on phases[0].min_trading_days, conservative=profitable_day. The one field where pass A and pass B's WORDING differed but the SUBSTANCE agreed (max_drawdown.anchor) was documented in provenance.reasoning as coincidental (pass B was independently describing SwiftTrader's own static-anchor rule, not corroborating ProTrader's), not treated as cross-product corroboration. Reconciliation was run and passes exactly (node tests/rules-reconciliation.test.js: fintokei/daily-loss-and-max-drawdown-100k.json PASS) against a hand-derived golden vector built from the firm's own $100k worked example (day-2 floor $97,850, day-3 floor $95,950, both derived from the prior day's EOD equity, plus the static $90,000 max-loss floor) -- the vector genuinely discriminates daily_loss.amount_pct, daily_loss.amount_basis and max_drawdown.amount_pct (verified via tests/corpus/reconciliation-discriminates.test.js). This firm was NOT previously present anywhere in this repository (verified: no rules/unverified/fintokei/ directory and no other fintokei reference existed before this run) -- this is a new addition, not a promotion.

    payout profit split pct: confirmed consistency: confirmed daily loss amount basis: confirmed daily loss amount pct: confirmed daily loss on breach: confirmed max drawdown amount pct: confirmed max drawdown anchor: confirmed (ProTrader-specific quote only; reader_b's agreement was coincidental cross-product, not corroboration) max drawdown type: confirmed min trading days: ambiguous (recorded, see ambiguities[]) profit target pct: confirmed profit target pct: confirmed pricing initial fee: confirmed

    No prior value is evidenced for this check. This is a record of our research, not a firm rule effective date.

    Link to this check

Earlier record links

These retained links open the complete size and program membership of the earlier grouped record. Each distinct check now has its own link.

2026-10-04 · earlier grouped record

2026-07-31 · earlier grouped record

What the rules say now

profit target pct (same across all modelled sizes)

All sizes8
In each phase, your goal is to make 8% (1st Phase) and 6% (2nd Phase) profit
retrieved sourced

min trading days (same across all modelled sizes)

All sizes3
check that you also have the required amount of 3 trading days
retrieved ambiguous

daily loss amount pct (same across all modelled sizes)

All sizes5
keep your daily loss limit calculated from EOD equity up to 5%
retrieved sourced

max drawdown amount pct (same across all modelled sizes)

All sizes10
s 10% of your starting capital
retrieved sourced

max drawdown type (same across all modelled sizes)

All sizesstatic
s 10% of your starting capital
retrieved sourced

max drawdown basis (same across all modelled sizes)

All sizesintraday equity (open positions included)
your equity can never fall below 90,000 USD at any time
retrieved sourced

consistency (same across all modelled sizes)

All sizes
These restrictions are not part of the standard evaluation conditions, and we apply them only to a very minor part of our traders
retrieved sourced

Rules and their verification status change without notice; the firm's own documentation is always the final authority. This page is independent research, not investment or trading advice, and PropSurvival is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Fintokei.