Elite Trader Funding — 1 Step Evaluation — Verification Record
1 Step Evaluation · Our recorded checks and their evidence. A corpus correction does not establish when a firm changed its rules.
Value stands · re-sourcing citation
looked · cited sentence not found at 4 URL(s)
Inspect the evidence or run your numbers
Run Elite Trader Funding — 1 Step Evaluation in the simulator — freeCitation findings
The recorded source wording was not found at the following locations. This does not establish that the firm's rule changed.
- https://elitetraderfunding.app/cost-to-get-funded-calculator (the cited passage is no longer on the page)
- https://elitetraderfunding.app/1-step-evaluation (quote ok)
- https://elitetraderfunding.app/help/how-the-1-step-plan-works (quote ok)
- https://elitetraderfunding.app/evaluations?plan=1-step-evaluation (new rule page)
Dated source-check records
- Confirmed, no changes
1 Step Evaluation · Normal corpus review current first party
USD 100,000 · USD 250,000 · USD 50,000 · recorded field scope; not a whole-plan verification
Field-by-field: 1 confirmed (1 field touched this pass).
Manifest row 61; auto_promote:false; 1Step intraday unrealized HWM versus EOD sister product separated; dollar sizes cannot be borrowed.23% ATD updated purchase-date rule held; excluded66profit_split untouched; pricing snapshot not currentacceptance. Scoped field review, not whole-plan acceptance. Held fields are deliberately absent from the confirmation map.
daily loss amount pct: confirmedNo prior value is evidenced for this check. This is a record of our research, not a firm rule effective date.
Sources recorded for this check:Link to this check
https://elitetraderfunding.app/1-step-evaluation - Confirmed · sources disagree on 0 field(s)
1 Step Evaluation · Normal corpus review current first party
USD 100,000 · USD 250,000 · USD 50,000 · recorded field scope; not a whole-plan verification
Manifest row 64; auto_promote:false; Elite23% ATD definition changed: beforeOct2 uses>=200/23%, purchasesfromOct2 2PMPT use>=250/30%. Payout qualifying-day condition is not an evaluation consistency rule; no new typed cohort system. Scoped field review, not whole-plan acceptance. Held fields are deliberately absent from the confirmation map.
No prior value is evidenced for this check. This is a record of our research, not a firm rule effective date.
Sources recorded for this check:Link to this check
https://elitetraderfunding.app/help/how-the-1-step-plan-works - Confirmed, no changes
1 Step Evaluation · Normal corpus review current first party
USD 100,000 · USD 250,000 · USD 50,000 · recorded field scope; not a whole-plan verification
Field-by-field: 4 confirmed (4 fields touched this pass).
Manifest row 62; auto_promote:false; 1Step intraday unrealized HWM versus EOD sister product separated; dollar sizes cannot be borrowed.23% ATD updated purchase-date rule held; excluded66profit_split untouched; pricing snapshot not currentacceptance. Scoped field review, not whole-plan acceptance. Held fields are deliberately absent from the confirmation map.
max drawdown anchor: confirmed max drawdown basis: confirmed max drawdown includes unrealized: confirmed max drawdown type: confirmedNo prior value is evidenced for this check. This is a record of our research, not a firm rule effective date.
Sources recorded for this check:Link to this check
https://elitetraderfunding.app/1-step-evaluation - Confirmed, no changes
1 Step Evaluation · Normal corpus review current first party
USD 100,000 · USD 250,000 · USD 50,000 · recorded field scope; not a whole-plan verification
Manifest row 63; auto_promote:false; 1Step intraday unrealized HWM versus EOD sister product separated; dollar sizes cannot be borrowed.23% ATD updated purchase-date rule held; excluded66profit_split untouched; pricing snapshot not currentacceptance. Scoped field review, not whole-plan acceptance. Held fields are deliberately absent from the confirmation map.
No prior value is evidenced for this check. This is a record of our research, not a firm rule effective date.
Sources recorded for this check:Link to this check
https://elitetraderfunding.app/1-step-evaluation - Confirmed · sources disagree on 0 field(s)
1 Step Evaluation · Normal corpus review current first party
USD 100,000 · USD 250,000 · USD 50,000 · recorded field scope; not a whole-plan verification
Manifest row 65; auto_promote:false; May2026 pricing snapshot explicitly directs reader to current plan fees. Does not support a current pricing refresh; preserve null/older provenance. Scoped field review, not whole-plan acceptance. Held fields are deliberately absent from the confirmation map.
No prior value is evidenced for this check. This is a record of our research, not a firm rule effective date.
Sources recorded for this check:Link to this check
https://elitetraderfunding.app/cost-to-get-funded-calculator - Confirmed, no changes
1 Step Evaluation · Normal corpus review current first party
USD 100,000 · USD 250,000 · USD 50,000 · recorded field scope; not a whole-plan verification
Field-by-field: 4 confirmed (4 fields touched this pass).
Manifest row 60; auto_promote:false; 1Step intraday unrealized HWM versus EOD sister product separated; dollar sizes cannot be borrowed.23% ATD updated purchase-date rule held; excluded66profit_split untouched; pricing snapshot not currentacceptance. Scoped field review, not whole-plan acceptance. Held fields are deliberately absent from the confirmation map.
max drawdown amount abs: confirmed max drawdown amount pct: confirmed profit target abs: confirmed profit target pct: confirmedNo prior value is evidenced for this check. This is a record of our research, not a firm rule effective date.
Sources recorded for this check:Link to this check
https://elitetraderfunding.app/1-step-evaluation - Confirmed · sources disagree on 3 field(s)
1 Step Evaluation · Two independent readers, each working blind to the other’s output and to the stored value
USD 100,000 · USD 250,000 · USD 50,000 · recorded field scope; not a whole-plan verification
Field-by-field: 6 confirmed · 4 preserved for the record · 1 noted (11 fields touched this pass).
Two independent blind first-party readers agree on every per-size number this file encodes directly from the account table (balance, live trailing drawdown, profit target) and on the flat $47 reset fee / monthly-subscription eval pricing. DISAGREE, all resolved per ambiguities[] above: (a) max_drawdown.anchor — reader A's 'highest unrealized profit reached intraday' vs reader B's explicit cross-day 'since account open' high-water mark; resolved to the persistent (never-resets) reading, corroborated by the firm's own multi-day worked example and matching the engine's only anchor model. (b) max_drawdown.locks — reader A frames the +$100 safety-net lock as post-pass/funded-stage only; reader B derives the same +$100 floor from a generically-titled 'Safety Net Requirements' table without confirming it applies during the evaluation; resolved to null (no lock during the modeled evaluation phase), matching this corpus's own rules/tradeify/50000.json precedent for excluding a funded-stage-only gate from the evaluation phase. (c) phases[0].consistency — reader A found no consistency rule on the evaluation page at all; reader B found a real 23% 'Active Trade Day' rule, but its own citation scopes it to funded-stage payout eligibility, not evaluation pass/fail; left empty for the same reason as (b). (d) pricing.initial_fee — no current per-size figure is citable (reader B explicit; reader A's $167 comes from a source that self-labels itself an outdated snapshot); left null. max_drawdown.basis was flagged as a disagreement by the merge but on inspection both readers describe the identical equity_intraday mechanic at different verbosity — not carried into ambiguities[], per this corpus's own agreed-field convention. On the account_size=50000 file specifically: the firm's own 'Worked example: passing a 50K 1 Step evaluation' text was re-verified directly against the live page (WebFetch, 2026-07-30, not just the reader transcript) for the hand-derived vectors at rules/elite-trader-funding/hand-derived/ — its opening-floor ($48,000) and post-spike-floor ($49,500) figures are internally consistent and hand-computable exactly as published, but its next sentence ('If you give back $1,000 of that open profit, you are at $49,000, still above the floor') is itself arithmetically inconsistent as published ($49,000 is below the stated $49,500 floor, and does not follow from giving back $1,000 of a +$1,500 gain either way) — flagged as the firm's own copy defect, excluded from the machine-asserted arithmetic rather than silently corrected. A second hand-derived vector at the same size asserts a breach at the $49,500 touch point, hand-derived from (not copying) reader B's own max_drawdown_quote fragment: 'Giving back open profit can breach you before the trade ever closes.'
consistency: disagree daily loss amount pct: confirmed max drawdown amount abs: confirmed max drawdown anchor: disagree max drawdown basis: confirmed (wording only, both readers agree equity_intraday) max drawdown locks: disagree max drawdown type: confirmed min trading days: confirmed profit target abs: confirmed pricing initial fee: disagree (both agree no static current price is citable) pricing reset price after breach: confirmedNo prior value is evidenced for this check. This is a record of our research, not a firm rule effective date.
Sources recorded for this check:Link to this check
https://elitetraderfunding.app/1-step-evaluation
https://elitetraderfunding.app/help/how-the-1-step-plan-works
https://elitetraderfunding.app/cost-to-get-funded-calculator
Earlier record links
These retained links open the complete size and program membership of the earlier grouped record. Each distinct check now has its own link.
2026-10-04 · earlier grouped record
- 1 Step Evaluation · sizes 50000, 100000, 250000 — inspect this distinct check
- 1 Step Evaluation · sizes 50000, 100000, 250000 — inspect this distinct check
- 1 Step Evaluation · sizes 50000, 100000, 250000 — inspect this distinct check
- 1 Step Evaluation · sizes 50000, 100000, 250000 — inspect this distinct check
- 1 Step Evaluation · sizes 50000, 100000, 250000 — inspect this distinct check
- 1 Step Evaluation · sizes 50000, 100000, 250000 — inspect this distinct check
2026-07-30 · earlier grouped record
What the rules say now
profit target pct (same across all modelled sizes)
100K 1 Step Balance $100,000 Live trailing drawdown $3,000 Profit target $6,000 Max position 14 minis or 140 microsretrieved sourced
min trading days (same across all modelled sizes)
You close winners and your realized balance reaches $53,000 on or after your fifth trading day. The evaluation is passed.retrieved sourced
daily loss amount pct (same across all modelled sizes)
No daily loss limit You are governed only by the live trailing drawdown. There is no separate per-day cap forcing you to stop trading early.retrieved sourced
max drawdown amount pct
100K 1 Step Balance $100,000 Live trailing drawdown $3,000 Profit target $6,000 Max position 14 minis or 140 microsretrieved sourced
100K 1 Step Balance $100,000 Live trailing drawdown $3,000 Profit target $6,000 Max position 14 minis or 140 microsretrieved sourced
100K 1 Step Balance $100,000 Live trailing drawdown $3,000 Profit target $6,000 Max position 14 minis or 140 microsretrieved sourced
max drawdown type (same across all modelled sizes)
The maximum allowed loss trails your highest unrealized profit during the day. If your open Pretrieved sourced
max drawdown basis (same across all modelled sizes)
The maximum allowed loss trails your highest unrealized profit during the day. If your open Pretrieved sourced
max drawdown locks
Earn realized profits equal to your max drawdown + $100, and the drawdown is permanently removed for payout eligibility.retrieved ambiguous
Earn realized profits equal to your max drawdown + $100, and the drawdown is permanently removed for payout eligibility.retrieved ambiguous
Earn realized profits equal to your max drawdown + $100, and the drawdown is permanently removed for payout eligibility.retrieved ambiguous
consistency (same across all modelled sizes)
Q: What qualifies as an ATD? Any day you place a trade that results in at least $200 realized profit and at least 23% of your best ATD P&L. ... 23% Rule: You must earn at least 23% of your best trading day's profit for the day to qualify. For example, if your best day's profit is $1,000, you must earn at least $230 on other days for them to count as ATDs.retrieved ambiguous
Rules and their verification status change without notice; the firm's own documentation is always the final authority. This page is independent research, not investment or trading advice, and PropSurvival is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Elite Trader Funding — 1 Step Evaluation.