Skip to content
PropSurvival
Run your analysisRun analysis — free
Menu
Verification Record

E8 Markets — E8 One — Verification Record

Latest recorded check: · 20 recorded checks

E8 One · Our recorded checks and their evidence. A corpus correction does not establish when a firm changed its rules.

Value stands · re-sourcing citation

looked · cited sentence not found at 6 URL(s)

Inspect citation findings

Inspect the evidence or run your numbers

Run E8 Markets — E8 One in the simulator — free

Citation findings

The recorded source wording was not found at the following locations. This does not establish that the firm's rule changed.

Dated source-check records

  • Confirmed, no changes

    E8 One (customizable 4-14% Dynamic Drawdown / 80-90-100% payout split; this file = the /e8-one page's own default config, 6% drawdown / 80% split) · Normal corpus review current first party

    USD 10,000 · USD 100,000 · USD 200,000 · USD 25,000 · USD 400,000 · USD 5,000 · USD 50,000 · USD 500,000 · recorded field scope; not a whole-plan verification

    Field-by-field: 1 confirmed (1 field touched this pass).

    Manifest row 47; auto_promote:false; E8One configurable: website100K selected9%target/6%DD/4%DLL/80%split; help preset6/4/3 different selection, not contradiction. DLL amountfixed%initial but floordaystartingbalance; closedbalance HWM, freezeinitial, unrealized equity can breach. Evaluation no consistency/min days, funded40%not borrowed. Scoped field review, not whole-plan acceptance. Held fields are deliberately absent from the confirmation map.

    payout profit split pct: confirmed

    No prior value is evidenced for this check. This is a record of our research, not a firm rule effective date.

    Sources recorded for this check:
    https://e8markets.com/e8-one
    Link to this check
  • Confirmed, no changes

    E8 One (customizable 4-14% Dynamic Drawdown / 80-90-100% payout split; this file = the /e8-one page's own default config, 6% drawdown / 80% split) · Normal corpus review current first party

    USD 10,000 · USD 100,000 · USD 200,000 · USD 25,000 · USD 400,000 · USD 5,000 · USD 50,000 · USD 500,000 · recorded field scope; not a whole-plan verification

    Field-by-field: 1 confirmed (1 field touched this pass).

    Manifest row 51; auto_promote:false; E8One configurable: website100K selected9%target/6%DD/4%DLL/80%split; help preset6/4/3 different selection, not contradiction. DLL amountfixed%initial but floordaystartingbalance; closedbalance HWM, freezeinitial, unrealized equity can breach. Evaluation no consistency/min days, funded40%not borrowed. Scoped field review, not whole-plan acceptance. Held fields are deliberately absent from the confirmation map.

    max drawdown basis: confirmed

    No prior value is evidenced for this check. This is a record of our research, not a firm rule effective date.

    Sources recorded for this check:
    https://help.e8markets.com/en/articles/11782996-dynamic-drawdown
    Link to this check
  • Confirmed, no changes

    E8 One (customizable 4-14% Dynamic Drawdown / 80-90-100% payout split; this file = the /e8-one page's own default config, 6% drawdown / 80% split) · Normal corpus review current first party

    USD 10,000 · USD 100,000 · USD 200,000 · USD 25,000 · USD 400,000 · USD 5,000 · USD 50,000 · USD 500,000 · recorded field scope; not a whole-plan verification

    Field-by-field: 1 confirmed (1 field touched this pass).

    Manifest row 48; auto_promote:false; E8One configurable: website100K selected9%target/6%DD/4%DLL/80%split; help preset6/4/3 different selection, not contradiction. DLL amountfixed%initial but floordaystartingbalance; closedbalance HWM, freezeinitial, unrealized equity can breach. Evaluation no consistency/min days, funded40%not borrowed. Scoped field review, not whole-plan acceptance. Held fields are deliberately absent from the confirmation map.

    daily loss on breach: confirmed

    No prior value is evidenced for this check. This is a record of our research, not a firm rule effective date.

    Sources recorded for this check:
    https://help.e8markets.com/en/articles/11769446-daily-drawdown
    Link to this check
  • Confirmed, no changes

    E8 One (customizable 4-14% Dynamic Drawdown / 80-90-100% payout split; this file = the /e8-one page's own default config, 6% drawdown / 80% split) · Normal corpus review current first party

    USD 10,000 · USD 100,000 · USD 200,000 · USD 25,000 · USD 400,000 · USD 5,000 · USD 50,000 · USD 500,000 · recorded field scope; not a whole-plan verification

    Field-by-field: 1 confirmed (1 field touched this pass).

    Manifest row 54; auto_promote:false; E8One configurable: website100K selected9%target/6%DD/4%DLL/80%split; help preset6/4/3 different selection, not contradiction. DLL amountfixed%initial but floordaystartingbalance; closedbalance HWM, freezeinitial, unrealized equity can breach. Evaluation no consistency/min days, funded40%not borrowed. Scoped field review, not whole-plan acceptance. Held fields are deliberately absent from the confirmation map.

    min trading days: confirmed

    No prior value is evidenced for this check. This is a record of our research, not a firm rule effective date.

    Sources recorded for this check:
    https://e8markets.com/e8-one
    Link to this check
  • Confirmed, no changes

    E8 One (customizable 4-14% Dynamic Drawdown / 80-90-100% payout split; this file = the /e8-one page's own default config, 6% drawdown / 80% split) · Normal corpus review current first party

    USD 100,000 · recorded field scope; not a whole-plan verification

    Field-by-field: 3 confirmed (3 fields touched this pass).

    Manifest row 46; auto_promote:false; E8One configurable: website100K selected9%target/6%DD/4%DLL/80%split; help preset6/4/3 different selection, not contradiction. DLL amountfixed%initial but floordaystartingbalance; closedbalance HWM, freezeinitial, unrealized equity can breach. Evaluation no consistency/min days, funded40%not borrowed. Scoped field review, not whole-plan acceptance. Held fields are deliberately absent from the confirmation map.

    daily loss amount pct: confirmed max drawdown amount pct: confirmed profit target pct: confirmed

    No prior value is evidenced for this check. This is a record of our research, not a firm rule effective date.

    Sources recorded for this check:
    https://e8markets.com/e8-one
    Link to this check
  • Confirmed, no changes

    E8 One (customizable 4-14% Dynamic Drawdown / 80-90-100% payout split; this file = the /e8-one page's own default config, 6% drawdown / 80% split) · Normal corpus review current first party

    USD 10,000 · USD 100,000 · USD 200,000 · USD 25,000 · USD 400,000 · USD 5,000 · USD 50,000 · USD 500,000 · recorded field scope; not a whole-plan verification

    Field-by-field: 1 confirmed (1 field touched this pass).

    Manifest row 53; auto_promote:false; E8One configurable: website100K selected9%target/6%DD/4%DLL/80%split; help preset6/4/3 different selection, not contradiction. DLL amountfixed%initial but floordaystartingbalance; closedbalance HWM, freezeinitial, unrealized equity can breach. Evaluation no consistency/min days, funded40%not borrowed. Scoped field review, not whole-plan acceptance. Held fields are deliberately absent from the confirmation map.

    consistency: confirmed

    No prior value is evidenced for this check. This is a record of our research, not a firm rule effective date.

    Sources recorded for this check:
    https://help.e8markets.com/en/articles/11775980-e8-one
    Link to this check
  • Confirmed, no changes

    E8 One (customizable 4-14% Dynamic Drawdown / 80-90-100% payout split; this file = the /e8-one page's own default config, 6% drawdown / 80% split) · Normal corpus review current first party

    USD 10,000 · USD 100,000 · USD 200,000 · USD 25,000 · USD 400,000 · USD 5,000 · USD 50,000 · USD 500,000 · recorded field scope; not a whole-plan verification

    Field-by-field: 2 confirmed (2 fields touched this pass).

    Manifest row 50; auto_promote:false; E8One configurable: website100K selected9%target/6%DD/4%DLL/80%split; help preset6/4/3 different selection, not contradiction. DLL amountfixed%initial but floordaystartingbalance; closedbalance HWM, freezeinitial, unrealized equity can breach. Evaluation no consistency/min days, funded40%not borrowed. Scoped field review, not whole-plan acceptance. Held fields are deliberately absent from the confirmation map.

    max drawdown anchor: confirmed max drawdown type: confirmed

    No prior value is evidenced for this check. This is a record of our research, not a firm rule effective date.

    Sources recorded for this check:
    https://help.e8markets.com/en/articles/11782996-dynamic-drawdown
    Link to this check
  • Confirmed, no changes

    E8 One (customizable 4-14% Dynamic Drawdown / 80-90-100% payout split; this file = the /e8-one page's own default config, 6% drawdown / 80% split) · Normal corpus review current first party

    USD 10,000 · USD 100,000 · USD 200,000 · USD 25,000 · USD 400,000 · USD 5,000 · USD 50,000 · USD 500,000 · recorded field scope; not a whole-plan verification

    Field-by-field: 1 confirmed (1 field touched this pass).

    Manifest row 52; auto_promote:false; E8One configurable: website100K selected9%target/6%DD/4%DLL/80%split; help preset6/4/3 different selection, not contradiction. DLL amountfixed%initial but floordaystartingbalance; closedbalance HWM, freezeinitial, unrealized equity can breach. Evaluation no consistency/min days, funded40%not borrowed. Scoped field review, not whole-plan acceptance. Held fields are deliberately absent from the confirmation map.

    max drawdown locks: confirmed

    No prior value is evidenced for this check. This is a record of our research, not a firm rule effective date.

    Sources recorded for this check:
    https://help.e8markets.com/en/articles/11782996-dynamic-drawdown
    Link to this check
  • Confirmed, no changes

    E8 One (customizable 4-14% Dynamic Drawdown / 80-90-100% payout split; this file = the /e8-one page's own default config, 6% drawdown / 80% split) · Normal corpus review current first party

    USD 10,000 · USD 100,000 · USD 200,000 · USD 25,000 · USD 400,000 · USD 5,000 · USD 50,000 · USD 500,000 · recorded field scope; not a whole-plan verification

    Field-by-field: 1 confirmed (1 field touched this pass).

    Manifest row 49; auto_promote:false; E8One configurable: website100K selected9%target/6%DD/4%DLL/80%split; help preset6/4/3 different selection, not contradiction. DLL amountfixed%initial but floordaystartingbalance; closedbalance HWM, freezeinitial, unrealized equity can breach. Evaluation no consistency/min days, funded40%not borrowed. Scoped field review, not whole-plan acceptance. Held fields are deliberately absent from the confirmation map.

    daily loss amount basis: confirmed

    No prior value is evidenced for this check. This is a record of our research, not a firm rule effective date.

    Sources recorded for this check:
    https://help.e8markets.com/en/articles/11769446-daily-drawdown
    Link to this check
  • Documented absent

    E8 One (customizable 4-14% Dynamic Drawdown / 80-90-100% payout split; this file = the /e8-one page's own default config, 6% drawdown / 80% split) · First party single pass

    USD 10,000 · USD 100,000 · USD 200,000 · USD 25,000 · USD 400,000 · USD 5,000 · USD 50,000 · USD 500,000 · recorded field scope; not a whole-plan verification

    Field-by-field: 1 noted (1 field touched this pass).

    trader-relations review CONCERNS: cycle_days omission still rested on search-engine extractions of a Cloudflare-403 help article (3-day first payout, Pro/Zero daily) with no Wayback/r.jina.ai re-read -- the same unverified-source class already corrected on Apex/Phidias. The Wayback Machine was temporarily offline this pass, but a direct r.jina.ai fetch of the cited article succeeded (it was not blocked this time) and verbatim-confirms the on-demand/no-fixed-schedule claim and the Pro/Zero-pay-daily carve-out. The specific "3 days into the performance stage" figure from the prior note could not be re-confirmed in this pass's text fetch (its source section renders as collapsed/JS content) and has been dropped rather than re-asserted unverified. Field remains correctly documented-absent.

    payout cycle days: documented-absent (re-verified via a genuine first-party read, not a search extraction)

    No prior value is evidenced for this check. This is a record of our research, not a firm rule effective date.

    Sources recorded for this check:
    https://help.e8markets.com/en/articles/9448349-what-is-the-payout-on-demand
    Link to this check
  • Documented absent

    E8 One (customizable 4-14% Dynamic Drawdown / 80-90-100% payout split; this file = the /e8-one page's own default config, 6% drawdown / 80% split) · First party single pass

    USD 10,000 · USD 100,000 · USD 200,000 · USD 25,000 · USD 400,000 · USD 5,000 · USD 50,000 · USD 500,000 · recorded field scope; not a whole-plan verification

    Field-by-field: 1 noted (1 field touched this pass).

    trader-relations review CONCERNS: the documented-absent note's primary verbatim quote ("Once you reach the SimFi Performance Account stage on E8 Signature...") is E8 Signature on-demand language, while this file models E8 One; One was only supported by the Pro/Zero carve-out, not an affirmative One cadence quote -- a wrong-product-line quote mixing class similar to the earlier FundedNext finding on this branch. Re-read the same article: it is structured as one "On demand for [product]:" section per product, and the E8 One section's own heading plus its Pro/Zero carve-out sentence is the article's actual affirmative statement for E8 One, not the Signature-scoped opening sentence. Reworded the note to cite the E8 One section specifically and to stop quoting the Signature sentence as if it covered E8 One. Also re-attempted (twice, with different fetch options) the E8 One rules article's own "Criteria for the payout" section for an independent confirmation; it renders with no extractable text both times, so it is noted as inconclusive rather than silently dropped. Field remains correctly documented-absent.

    payout cycle days: documented-absent (note corrected to cite the E8 One section, not the Signature-scoped intro sentence)

    No prior value is evidenced for this check. This is a record of our research, not a firm rule effective date.

    Sources recorded for this check:
    https://help.e8markets.com/en/articles/9448349-what-is-the-payout-on-demand
    Link to this check
  • Documented absent

    E8 One (customizable 4-14% Dynamic Drawdown / 80-90-100% payout split; this file = the /e8-one page's own default config, 6% drawdown / 80% split) · First party single pass

    USD 10,000 · USD 100,000 · USD 200,000 · USD 25,000 · USD 400,000 · USD 5,000 · USD 50,000 · USD 500,000 · recorded field scope; not a whole-plan verification

    Field-by-field: 1 noted (1 field touched this pass).

    PKG-E payout/reset-fee provenance backfill. E8 One is an explicit Payout-On-Demand model (no fixed cycle by design); left null with a documented omission (source page Cloudflare-blocked from direct re-fetch this session, corroborated via two independent search extractions).

    payout cycle days: documented-absent

    No prior value is evidenced for this check. This is a record of our research, not a firm rule effective date.

    Sources recorded for this check:
    https://help.e8markets.com/en/articles/9448349-what-is-the-payout-on-demand
    Link to this check
  • Confirmed · sources disagree on 0 field(s)

    E8 One (customizable 4-14% Dynamic Drawdown / 80-90-100% payout split; this file = the /e8-one page's own default config, 6% drawdown / 80% split) · Two independent readers, each working blind to the other’s output and to the stored value

    USD 25,000 · recorded field scope; not a whole-plan verification

    Field-by-field: 12 confirmed · 2 preserved for the record (14 fields touched this pass).

    Both blind passes agree on the E8 One (page-default 6% Dynamic Drawdown / 80% split) numbers for the $25K size: profit target 2250 (9%), Daily Drawdown 1000 (4% of initial, fixed-$ floor re-anchored to each day's starting balance, hard breach), Dynamic Drawdown 1500 (6%, trailing off the highest CLOSED-trade balance only, never falling, locking forever once it would reach the account's own initial balance), 0 minimum trading days, and NO consistency rule at the evaluation/challenge stage (the 40% best-day rule both passes cite applies only at the separate SimFi(TM) Performance/funded stage, which this phase does not model). Reader B reported only $ amounts for the drawdown ladder, not a separate percentage, and recorded the 80% profit split as null/uncovered rather than a conflicting number; reader A's explicit 6% drawdown and 80% split are arithmetically exact / directly quoted, so both are coverage gaps, not conflicts, and are not promoted to ambiguities[] (see the max_drawdown.amount_pct and payout.profit_split_pct provenance notes). The $100,000-size worked example at help.e8markets.com/.../11782996-dynamic-drawdown reproduces exactly against this file's mechanic (see golden vector). Remaining disagreement surface across both passes was almost entirely citation wording/URL choice (card vs. requirements-table vs. help-center phrasing for the same number) — not a data conflict — and is not promoted to ambiguities[]. UNRESOLVED (logged as ambiguities[], not silently picked): (a) whether floating/intraday equity (vs. only the closed balance) can trip the Dynamic Drawdown floor, and the same open question for the Daily Drawdown floor — no first-party sentence found either way for either mechanic. STRUCTURAL: E8 One is a single point on the firm's own customizable 4-14% drawdown / 80-90-100% payout-split slider (profit target = 1.5x chosen drawdown, daily loss ~= 66% of chosen drawdown, per the firm's own stated formula) — every figure in this file, including the 80% profit split, is the page's own DEFAULT config, not a firm-wide constant; a different slider choice re-derives every $ figure in this file. E8 Pro / E8 Signature / E8 Zero are separate lower-or-no-consistency-rule products whose dedicated marketing pages would not render past site-wide footer boilerplate through the retrieval proxy across multiple fetch strategies this run and could not be first-party sourced.

    payout profit split pct: confirmed consistency: confirmed daily loss amount basis: confirmed daily loss amount pct: confirmed daily loss includes unrealized: unverifiable daily loss on breach: confirmed max drawdown amount pct: confirmed max drawdown anchor: confirmed max drawdown basis: confirmed max drawdown includes unrealized: unverifiable max drawdown locks: confirmed max drawdown type: confirmed min trading days: confirmed profit target pct: confirmed

    No prior value is evidenced for this check. This is a record of our research, not a firm rule effective date.

    Sources recorded for this check:
    https://e8markets.com/e8-one
    https://e8markets.com/
    https://help.e8markets.com/en/articles/11782996-dynamic-drawdown
    https://help.e8markets.com/en/articles/11769446-daily-drawdown
    https://help.e8markets.com/en/articles/11775980-e8-one
    https://help.e8markets.com/en/articles/9448349-what-is-the-payout-on-demand
    Link to this check
  • Confirmed · sources disagree on 0 field(s)

    E8 One (customizable 4-14% Dynamic Drawdown / 80-90-100% payout split; this file = the /e8-one page's own default config, 6% drawdown / 80% split) · Two independent readers, each working blind to the other’s output and to the stored value

    USD 50,000 · recorded field scope; not a whole-plan verification

    Field-by-field: 12 confirmed · 2 preserved for the record (14 fields touched this pass).

    Both blind passes agree on the E8 One (page-default 6% Dynamic Drawdown / 80% split) numbers for the $50K size: profit target 4500 (9%), Daily Drawdown 2000 (4% of initial, fixed-$ floor re-anchored to each day's starting balance, hard breach), Dynamic Drawdown 3000 (6%, trailing off the highest CLOSED-trade balance only, never falling, locking forever once it would reach the account's own initial balance), 0 minimum trading days, and NO consistency rule at the evaluation/challenge stage (the 40% best-day rule both passes cite applies only at the separate SimFi(TM) Performance/funded stage, which this phase does not model). Reader B reported only $ amounts for the drawdown ladder, not a separate percentage, and recorded the 80% profit split as null/uncovered rather than a conflicting number; reader A's explicit 6% drawdown and 80% split are arithmetically exact / directly quoted, so both are coverage gaps, not conflicts, and are not promoted to ambiguities[] (see the max_drawdown.amount_pct and payout.profit_split_pct provenance notes). The $100,000-size worked example at help.e8markets.com/.../11782996-dynamic-drawdown reproduces exactly against this file's mechanic (see golden vector). Remaining disagreement surface across both passes was almost entirely citation wording/URL choice (card vs. requirements-table vs. help-center phrasing for the same number) — not a data conflict — and is not promoted to ambiguities[]. UNRESOLVED (logged as ambiguities[], not silently picked): (a) whether floating/intraday equity (vs. only the closed balance) can trip the Dynamic Drawdown floor, and the same open question for the Daily Drawdown floor — no first-party sentence found either way for either mechanic. STRUCTURAL: E8 One is a single point on the firm's own customizable 4-14% drawdown / 80-90-100% payout-split slider (profit target = 1.5x chosen drawdown, daily loss ~= 66% of chosen drawdown, per the firm's own stated formula) — every figure in this file, including the 80% profit split, is the page's own DEFAULT config, not a firm-wide constant; a different slider choice re-derives every $ figure in this file. E8 Pro / E8 Signature / E8 Zero are separate lower-or-no-consistency-rule products whose dedicated marketing pages would not render past site-wide footer boilerplate through the retrieval proxy across multiple fetch strategies this run and could not be first-party sourced.

    payout profit split pct: confirmed consistency: confirmed daily loss amount basis: confirmed daily loss amount pct: confirmed daily loss includes unrealized: unverifiable daily loss on breach: confirmed max drawdown amount pct: confirmed max drawdown anchor: confirmed max drawdown basis: confirmed max drawdown includes unrealized: unverifiable max drawdown locks: confirmed max drawdown type: confirmed min trading days: confirmed profit target pct: confirmed

    No prior value is evidenced for this check. This is a record of our research, not a firm rule effective date.

    Sources recorded for this check:
    https://e8markets.com/e8-one
    https://e8markets.com/
    https://help.e8markets.com/en/articles/11782996-dynamic-drawdown
    https://help.e8markets.com/en/articles/11769446-daily-drawdown
    https://help.e8markets.com/en/articles/11775980-e8-one
    https://help.e8markets.com/en/articles/9448349-what-is-the-payout-on-demand
    Link to this check
  • Confirmed · sources disagree on 1 field(s)

    E8 One (customizable 4-14% Dynamic Drawdown / 80-90-100% payout split; this file = the /e8-one page's own default config, 6% drawdown / 80% split) · Two independent readers, each working blind to the other’s output and to the stored value

    USD 100,000 · recorded field scope; not a whole-plan verification

    Field-by-field: 12 confirmed · 3 preserved for the record (15 fields touched this pass).

    Both blind passes agree on the E8 One (page-default 6% Dynamic Drawdown / 80% split) numbers for the $100K size: profit target 9000 (9%), Daily Drawdown 4000 (4% of initial, fixed-$ floor re-anchored to each day's starting balance, hard breach), Dynamic Drawdown 6000 (6%, trailing off the highest CLOSED-trade balance only, never falling, locking forever once it would reach the account's own initial balance), 0 minimum trading days, and NO consistency rule at the evaluation/challenge stage (the 40% best-day rule both passes cite applies only at the separate SimFi(TM) Performance/funded stage, which this phase does not model). Reader B reported only $ amounts for the drawdown ladder, not a separate percentage, and recorded the 80% profit split as null/uncovered rather than a conflicting number; reader A's explicit 6% drawdown and 80% split are arithmetically exact / directly quoted, so both are coverage gaps, not conflicts, and are not promoted to ambiguities[] (see the max_drawdown.amount_pct and payout.profit_split_pct provenance notes). The $100,000-size worked example at help.e8markets.com/.../11782996-dynamic-drawdown reproduces exactly against this file's mechanic (see golden vector). Remaining disagreement surface across both passes was almost entirely citation wording/URL choice (card vs. requirements-table vs. help-center phrasing for the same number) — not a data conflict — and is not promoted to ambiguities[]. UNRESOLVED (logged as ambiguities[], not silently picked): (a) whether floating/intraday equity (vs. only the closed balance) can trip the Dynamic Drawdown floor, and the same open question for the Daily Drawdown floor — no first-party sentence found either way for either mechanic. (b) a genuine two-page $100K pricing conflict ($366 on /e8-one vs. "just $398" on the homepage promo tile for the same product code, plausibly but not confirmedly explained by the promo tile's different dr=4 slider position). STRUCTURAL: E8 One is a single point on the firm's own customizable 4-14% drawdown / 80-90-100% payout-split slider (profit target = 1.5x chosen drawdown, daily loss ~= 66% of chosen drawdown, per the firm's own stated formula) — every figure in this file, including the 80% profit split, is the page's own DEFAULT config, not a firm-wide constant; a different slider choice re-derives every $ figure in this file. E8 Pro / E8 Signature / E8 Zero are separate lower-or-no-consistency-rule products whose dedicated marketing pages would not render past site-wide footer boilerplate through the retrieval proxy across multiple fetch strategies this run and could not be first-party sourced.

    payout profit split pct: confirmed consistency: confirmed daily loss amount basis: confirmed daily loss amount pct: confirmed daily loss includes unrealized: unverifiable daily loss on breach: confirmed max drawdown amount pct: confirmed max drawdown anchor: confirmed max drawdown basis: confirmed max drawdown includes unrealized: unverifiable max drawdown locks: confirmed max drawdown type: confirmed min trading days: confirmed profit target pct: confirmed pricing initial fee: disagree

    No prior value is evidenced for this check. This is a record of our research, not a firm rule effective date.

    Sources recorded for this check:
    https://e8markets.com/e8-one
    https://e8markets.com/
    https://help.e8markets.com/en/articles/11782996-dynamic-drawdown
    https://help.e8markets.com/en/articles/11769446-daily-drawdown
    https://help.e8markets.com/en/articles/11775980-e8-one
    https://help.e8markets.com/en/articles/9448349-what-is-the-payout-on-demand
    Link to this check
  • Confirmed · sources disagree on 0 field(s)

    E8 One (customizable 4-14% Dynamic Drawdown / 80-90-100% payout split; this file = the /e8-one page's own default config, 6% drawdown / 80% split) · Two independent readers, each working blind to the other’s output and to the stored value

    USD 200,000 · recorded field scope; not a whole-plan verification

    Field-by-field: 12 confirmed · 2 preserved for the record (14 fields touched this pass).

    Both blind passes agree on the E8 One (page-default 6% Dynamic Drawdown / 80% split) numbers for the $200K size: profit target 18000 (9%), Daily Drawdown 8000 (4% of initial, fixed-$ floor re-anchored to each day's starting balance, hard breach), Dynamic Drawdown 12000 (6%, trailing off the highest CLOSED-trade balance only, never falling, locking forever once it would reach the account's own initial balance), 0 minimum trading days, and NO consistency rule at the evaluation/challenge stage (the 40% best-day rule both passes cite applies only at the separate SimFi(TM) Performance/funded stage, which this phase does not model). Reader B reported only $ amounts for the drawdown ladder, not a separate percentage, and recorded the 80% profit split as null/uncovered rather than a conflicting number; reader A's explicit 6% drawdown and 80% split are arithmetically exact / directly quoted, so both are coverage gaps, not conflicts, and are not promoted to ambiguities[] (see the max_drawdown.amount_pct and payout.profit_split_pct provenance notes). The $100,000-size worked example at help.e8markets.com/.../11782996-dynamic-drawdown reproduces exactly against this file's mechanic (see golden vector). Remaining disagreement surface across both passes was almost entirely citation wording/URL choice (card vs. requirements-table vs. help-center phrasing for the same number) — not a data conflict — and is not promoted to ambiguities[]. UNRESOLVED (logged as ambiguities[], not silently picked): (a) whether floating/intraday equity (vs. only the closed balance) can trip the Dynamic Drawdown floor, and the same open question for the Daily Drawdown floor — no first-party sentence found either way for either mechanic. STRUCTURAL: E8 One is a single point on the firm's own customizable 4-14% drawdown / 80-90-100% payout-split slider (profit target = 1.5x chosen drawdown, daily loss ~= 66% of chosen drawdown, per the firm's own stated formula) — every figure in this file, including the 80% profit split, is the page's own DEFAULT config, not a firm-wide constant; a different slider choice re-derives every $ figure in this file. E8 Pro / E8 Signature / E8 Zero are separate lower-or-no-consistency-rule products whose dedicated marketing pages would not render past site-wide footer boilerplate through the retrieval proxy across multiple fetch strategies this run and could not be first-party sourced.

    payout profit split pct: confirmed consistency: confirmed daily loss amount basis: confirmed daily loss amount pct: confirmed daily loss includes unrealized: unverifiable daily loss on breach: confirmed max drawdown amount pct: confirmed max drawdown anchor: confirmed max drawdown basis: confirmed max drawdown includes unrealized: unverifiable max drawdown locks: confirmed max drawdown type: confirmed min trading days: confirmed profit target pct: confirmed

    No prior value is evidenced for this check. This is a record of our research, not a firm rule effective date.

    Sources recorded for this check:
    https://e8markets.com/e8-one
    https://e8markets.com/
    https://help.e8markets.com/en/articles/11782996-dynamic-drawdown
    https://help.e8markets.com/en/articles/11769446-daily-drawdown
    https://help.e8markets.com/en/articles/11775980-e8-one
    https://help.e8markets.com/en/articles/9448349-what-is-the-payout-on-demand
    Link to this check
  • Confirmed · sources disagree on 0 field(s)

    E8 One (customizable 4-14% Dynamic Drawdown / 80-90-100% payout split; this file = the /e8-one page's own default config, 6% drawdown / 80% split) · Two independent readers, each working blind to the other’s output and to the stored value

    USD 500,000 · recorded field scope; not a whole-plan verification

    Field-by-field: 12 confirmed · 2 preserved for the record (14 fields touched this pass).

    Both blind passes agree on the E8 One (page-default 6% Dynamic Drawdown / 80% split) numbers for the $500K size: profit target 45000 (9%), Daily Drawdown 20000 (4% of initial, fixed-$ floor re-anchored to each day's starting balance, hard breach), Dynamic Drawdown 30000 (6%, trailing off the highest CLOSED-trade balance only, never falling, locking forever once it would reach the account's own initial balance), 0 minimum trading days, and NO consistency rule at the evaluation/challenge stage (the 40% best-day rule both passes cite applies only at the separate SimFi(TM) Performance/funded stage, which this phase does not model). Reader B reported only $ amounts for the drawdown ladder, not a separate percentage, and recorded the 80% profit split as null/uncovered rather than a conflicting number; reader A's explicit 6% drawdown and 80% split are arithmetically exact / directly quoted, so both are coverage gaps, not conflicts, and are not promoted to ambiguities[] (see the max_drawdown.amount_pct and payout.profit_split_pct provenance notes). The $100,000-size worked example at help.e8markets.com/.../11782996-dynamic-drawdown reproduces exactly against this file's mechanic (see golden vector). Remaining disagreement surface across both passes was almost entirely citation wording/URL choice (card vs. requirements-table vs. help-center phrasing for the same number) — not a data conflict — and is not promoted to ambiguities[]. UNRESOLVED (logged as ambiguities[], not silently picked): (a) whether floating/intraday equity (vs. only the closed balance) can trip the Dynamic Drawdown floor, and the same open question for the Daily Drawdown floor — no first-party sentence found either way for either mechanic. STRUCTURAL: E8 One is a single point on the firm's own customizable 4-14% drawdown / 80-90-100% payout-split slider (profit target = 1.5x chosen drawdown, daily loss ~= 66% of chosen drawdown, per the firm's own stated formula) — every figure in this file, including the 80% profit split, is the page's own DEFAULT config, not a firm-wide constant; a different slider choice re-derives every $ figure in this file. E8 Pro / E8 Signature / E8 Zero are separate lower-or-no-consistency-rule products whose dedicated marketing pages would not render past site-wide footer boilerplate through the retrieval proxy across multiple fetch strategies this run and could not be first-party sourced.

    payout profit split pct: confirmed consistency: confirmed daily loss amount basis: confirmed daily loss amount pct: confirmed daily loss includes unrealized: unverifiable daily loss on breach: confirmed max drawdown amount pct: confirmed max drawdown anchor: confirmed max drawdown basis: confirmed max drawdown includes unrealized: unverifiable max drawdown locks: confirmed max drawdown type: confirmed min trading days: confirmed profit target pct: confirmed

    No prior value is evidenced for this check. This is a record of our research, not a firm rule effective date.

    Sources recorded for this check:
    https://e8markets.com/e8-one
    https://e8markets.com/
    https://help.e8markets.com/en/articles/11782996-dynamic-drawdown
    https://help.e8markets.com/en/articles/11769446-daily-drawdown
    https://help.e8markets.com/en/articles/11775980-e8-one
    https://help.e8markets.com/en/articles/9448349-what-is-the-payout-on-demand
    Link to this check
  • Confirmed · sources disagree on 0 field(s)

    E8 One (customizable 4-14% Dynamic Drawdown / 80-90-100% payout split; this file = the /e8-one page's own default config, 6% drawdown / 80% split) · Two independent readers, each working blind to the other’s output and to the stored value

    USD 5,000 · recorded field scope; not a whole-plan verification

    Field-by-field: 12 confirmed · 2 preserved for the record (14 fields touched this pass).

    Both blind passes agree on the E8 One (page-default 6% Dynamic Drawdown / 80% split) numbers for the $5K size: profit target 450 (9%), Daily Drawdown 200 (4% of initial, fixed-$ floor re-anchored to each day's starting balance, hard breach), Dynamic Drawdown 300 (6%, trailing off the highest CLOSED-trade balance only, never falling, locking forever once it would reach the account's own initial balance), 0 minimum trading days, and NO consistency rule at the evaluation/challenge stage (the 40% best-day rule both passes cite applies only at the separate SimFi(TM) Performance/funded stage, which this phase does not model). Reader B reported only $ amounts for the drawdown ladder, not a separate percentage, and recorded the 80% profit split as null/uncovered rather than a conflicting number; reader A's explicit 6% drawdown and 80% split are arithmetically exact / directly quoted, so both are coverage gaps, not conflicts, and are not promoted to ambiguities[] (see the max_drawdown.amount_pct and payout.profit_split_pct provenance notes). The $100,000-size worked example at help.e8markets.com/.../11782996-dynamic-drawdown reproduces exactly against this file's mechanic (see golden vector). Remaining disagreement surface across both passes was almost entirely citation wording/URL choice (card vs. requirements-table vs. help-center phrasing for the same number) — not a data conflict — and is not promoted to ambiguities[]. UNRESOLVED (logged as ambiguities[], not silently picked): (a) whether floating/intraday equity (vs. only the closed balance) can trip the Dynamic Drawdown floor, and the same open question for the Daily Drawdown floor — no first-party sentence found either way for either mechanic. STRUCTURAL: E8 One is a single point on the firm's own customizable 4-14% drawdown / 80-90-100% payout-split slider (profit target = 1.5x chosen drawdown, daily loss ~= 66% of chosen drawdown, per the firm's own stated formula) — every figure in this file, including the 80% profit split, is the page's own DEFAULT config, not a firm-wide constant; a different slider choice re-derives every $ figure in this file. E8 Pro / E8 Signature / E8 Zero are separate lower-or-no-consistency-rule products whose dedicated marketing pages would not render past site-wide footer boilerplate through the retrieval proxy across multiple fetch strategies this run and could not be first-party sourced.

    payout profit split pct: confirmed consistency: confirmed daily loss amount basis: confirmed daily loss amount pct: confirmed daily loss includes unrealized: unverifiable daily loss on breach: confirmed max drawdown amount pct: confirmed max drawdown anchor: confirmed max drawdown basis: confirmed max drawdown includes unrealized: unverifiable max drawdown locks: confirmed max drawdown type: confirmed min trading days: confirmed profit target pct: confirmed

    No prior value is evidenced for this check. This is a record of our research, not a firm rule effective date.

    Sources recorded for this check:
    https://e8markets.com/e8-one
    https://e8markets.com/
    https://help.e8markets.com/en/articles/11782996-dynamic-drawdown
    https://help.e8markets.com/en/articles/11769446-daily-drawdown
    https://help.e8markets.com/en/articles/11775980-e8-one
    https://help.e8markets.com/en/articles/9448349-what-is-the-payout-on-demand
    Link to this check
  • Confirmed · sources disagree on 0 field(s)

    E8 One (customizable 4-14% Dynamic Drawdown / 80-90-100% payout split; this file = the /e8-one page's own default config, 6% drawdown / 80% split) · Two independent readers, each working blind to the other’s output and to the stored value

    USD 400,000 · recorded field scope; not a whole-plan verification

    Field-by-field: 12 confirmed · 2 preserved for the record (14 fields touched this pass).

    Both blind passes agree on the E8 One (page-default 6% Dynamic Drawdown / 80% split) numbers for the $400K size: profit target 36000 (9%), Daily Drawdown 16000 (4% of initial, fixed-$ floor re-anchored to each day's starting balance, hard breach), Dynamic Drawdown 24000 (6%, trailing off the highest CLOSED-trade balance only, never falling, locking forever once it would reach the account's own initial balance), 0 minimum trading days, and NO consistency rule at the evaluation/challenge stage (the 40% best-day rule both passes cite applies only at the separate SimFi(TM) Performance/funded stage, which this phase does not model). Reader B reported only $ amounts for the drawdown ladder, not a separate percentage, and recorded the 80% profit split as null/uncovered rather than a conflicting number; reader A's explicit 6% drawdown and 80% split are arithmetically exact / directly quoted, so both are coverage gaps, not conflicts, and are not promoted to ambiguities[] (see the max_drawdown.amount_pct and payout.profit_split_pct provenance notes). The $100,000-size worked example at help.e8markets.com/.../11782996-dynamic-drawdown reproduces exactly against this file's mechanic (see golden vector). Remaining disagreement surface across both passes was almost entirely citation wording/URL choice (card vs. requirements-table vs. help-center phrasing for the same number) — not a data conflict — and is not promoted to ambiguities[]. UNRESOLVED (logged as ambiguities[], not silently picked): (a) whether floating/intraday equity (vs. only the closed balance) can trip the Dynamic Drawdown floor, and the same open question for the Daily Drawdown floor — no first-party sentence found either way for either mechanic. STRUCTURAL: E8 One is a single point on the firm's own customizable 4-14% drawdown / 80-90-100% payout-split slider (profit target = 1.5x chosen drawdown, daily loss ~= 66% of chosen drawdown, per the firm's own stated formula) — every figure in this file, including the 80% profit split, is the page's own DEFAULT config, not a firm-wide constant; a different slider choice re-derives every $ figure in this file. E8 Pro / E8 Signature / E8 Zero are separate lower-or-no-consistency-rule products whose dedicated marketing pages would not render past site-wide footer boilerplate through the retrieval proxy across multiple fetch strategies this run and could not be first-party sourced.

    payout profit split pct: confirmed consistency: confirmed daily loss amount basis: confirmed daily loss amount pct: confirmed daily loss includes unrealized: unverifiable daily loss on breach: confirmed max drawdown amount pct: confirmed max drawdown anchor: confirmed max drawdown basis: confirmed max drawdown includes unrealized: unverifiable max drawdown locks: confirmed max drawdown type: confirmed min trading days: confirmed profit target pct: confirmed

    No prior value is evidenced for this check. This is a record of our research, not a firm rule effective date.

    Sources recorded for this check:
    https://e8markets.com/e8-one
    https://e8markets.com/
    https://help.e8markets.com/en/articles/11782996-dynamic-drawdown
    https://help.e8markets.com/en/articles/11769446-daily-drawdown
    https://help.e8markets.com/en/articles/11775980-e8-one
    https://help.e8markets.com/en/articles/9448349-what-is-the-payout-on-demand
    Link to this check
  • Confirmed · sources disagree on 0 field(s)

    E8 One (customizable 4-14% Dynamic Drawdown / 80-90-100% payout split; this file = the /e8-one page's own default config, 6% drawdown / 80% split) · Two independent readers, each working blind to the other’s output and to the stored value

    USD 10,000 · recorded field scope; not a whole-plan verification

    Field-by-field: 12 confirmed · 2 preserved for the record (14 fields touched this pass).

    Both blind passes agree on the E8 One (page-default 6% Dynamic Drawdown / 80% split) numbers for the $10K size: profit target 900 (9%), Daily Drawdown 400 (4% of initial, fixed-$ floor re-anchored to each day's starting balance, hard breach), Dynamic Drawdown 600 (6%, trailing off the highest CLOSED-trade balance only, never falling, locking forever once it would reach the account's own initial balance), 0 minimum trading days, and NO consistency rule at the evaluation/challenge stage (the 40% best-day rule both passes cite applies only at the separate SimFi(TM) Performance/funded stage, which this phase does not model). Reader B reported only $ amounts for the drawdown ladder, not a separate percentage, and recorded the 80% profit split as null/uncovered rather than a conflicting number; reader A's explicit 6% drawdown and 80% split are arithmetically exact / directly quoted, so both are coverage gaps, not conflicts, and are not promoted to ambiguities[] (see the max_drawdown.amount_pct and payout.profit_split_pct provenance notes). The $100,000-size worked example at help.e8markets.com/.../11782996-dynamic-drawdown reproduces exactly against this file's mechanic (see golden vector). Remaining disagreement surface across both passes was almost entirely citation wording/URL choice (card vs. requirements-table vs. help-center phrasing for the same number) — not a data conflict — and is not promoted to ambiguities[]. UNRESOLVED (logged as ambiguities[], not silently picked): (a) whether floating/intraday equity (vs. only the closed balance) can trip the Dynamic Drawdown floor, and the same open question for the Daily Drawdown floor — no first-party sentence found either way for either mechanic. STRUCTURAL: E8 One is a single point on the firm's own customizable 4-14% drawdown / 80-90-100% payout-split slider (profit target = 1.5x chosen drawdown, daily loss ~= 66% of chosen drawdown, per the firm's own stated formula) — every figure in this file, including the 80% profit split, is the page's own DEFAULT config, not a firm-wide constant; a different slider choice re-derives every $ figure in this file. E8 Pro / E8 Signature / E8 Zero are separate lower-or-no-consistency-rule products whose dedicated marketing pages would not render past site-wide footer boilerplate through the retrieval proxy across multiple fetch strategies this run and could not be first-party sourced.

    payout profit split pct: confirmed consistency: confirmed daily loss amount basis: confirmed daily loss amount pct: confirmed daily loss includes unrealized: unverifiable daily loss on breach: confirmed max drawdown amount pct: confirmed max drawdown anchor: confirmed max drawdown basis: confirmed max drawdown includes unrealized: unverifiable max drawdown locks: confirmed max drawdown type: confirmed min trading days: confirmed profit target pct: confirmed

    No prior value is evidenced for this check. This is a record of our research, not a firm rule effective date.

    Sources recorded for this check:
    https://e8markets.com/e8-one
    https://e8markets.com/
    https://help.e8markets.com/en/articles/11782996-dynamic-drawdown
    https://help.e8markets.com/en/articles/11769446-daily-drawdown
    https://help.e8markets.com/en/articles/11775980-e8-one
    https://help.e8markets.com/en/articles/9448349-what-is-the-payout-on-demand
    Link to this check

Earlier record links

These retained links open the complete size and program membership of the earlier grouped record. Each distinct check now has its own link.

2026-10-04 · earlier grouped record

2026-09-13 · earlier grouped record

2026-09-13 · earlier grouped record

2026-07-30 · earlier grouped record

What the rules say now

profit target pct (same across all modelled sizes)

All sizes9
Profit Target 450 ($5K account row, E8 One requirements table; also shown on the account-config card at Drawdown "6% Max", Payout "80%", Drawdown type "Dynamic")
retrieved sourced

min trading days (same across all modelled sizes)

All sizes0
Unlimited trading day. No minimum.
retrieved sourced

daily loss amount pct (same across all modelled sizes)

All sizes4
Daily Drawdown 200 ($5K account row, E8 One requirements table); general mechanic on the same page: "Daily drawdown Calculated at 66% of your drawdown. Hard breach." (66% of the 6% default rounds to the page's own 200 figures — the dollar figures, not the rounded "66%" prose, are what this file encodes)
retrieved sourced

max drawdown amount pct (same across all modelled sizes)

All sizes6
Max Drawdown 300 ($5K account row, E8 One requirements table; also shown on the account-config card as "Max drawdown 300" at Drawdown "6% Max")
retrieved sourced

max drawdown type (same across all modelled sizes)

All sizestrailing
Dynamic Drawdown refers to the calculation based on the last Highest Closed Balance.
retrieved sourced

max drawdown basis (same across all modelled sizes)

All sizesbalance after each closed trade
Highest Closed Balance - Drawdown amount (6%) = Loss level
retrieved sourced

max drawdown locks (same across all modelled sizes)

All sizes[object Object]
You close +$7k profit (Loss level raises by 4k and locks forever at the initial
retrieved sourced

consistency (same across all modelled sizes)

All sizes
During the SimFI™ challenge stage, there is no consistency rule
retrieved sourced

Rules and their verification status change without notice; the firm's own documentation is always the final authority. This page is independent research, not investment or trading advice, and PropSurvival is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by E8 Markets — E8 One.