Skip to content
PropSurvival
Verification Record

Alpha Futures — Direct Qualified — Verification Record

Latest recorded check: · 11 recorded checks

Direct Qualified · Our recorded checks and their evidence. A corpus correction does not establish when a firm changed its rules.

Value stands · re-sourcing citation

looked · cited sentence not found at 19 URL(s)

Inspect citation findings

Citation findings

The recorded source wording was not found at the following locations. This does not establish that the firm's rule changed.

Dated source-check records

  • Confirmed, no changes

    Direct Qualified (instant-funded: skips the Evaluation stage, starts directly on a Qualified/funded account) · Normal corpus review current first party

    USD 100,000 · USD 150,000 · USD 25,000 · USD 50,000 · recorded field scope; not a whole-plan verification

    Field-by-field: 1 confirmed (1 field touched this pass).

    Manifest row 13; auto_promote:false; Direct Qualified is instant/no evaluation;25/50/100/150k separated. Fee values untouched; DLL2%initial softflatten/sessionlockout; MLL trails EOD balance, breach can include floating equity, freeze atinitial. Scoped field review, not whole-plan acceptance. Held fields are deliberately absent from the confirmation map.

    max drawdown includes unrealized: confirmed

    No prior value is evidenced for this check. This is a record of our research, not a firm rule effective date.

    Link to this check
  • Confirmed, no changes

    Direct Qualified (instant-funded: skips the Evaluation stage, starts directly on a Qualified/funded account) · Normal corpus review current first party

    USD 100,000 · USD 150,000 · USD 25,000 · USD 50,000 · recorded field scope; not a whole-plan verification

    Field-by-field: 1 confirmed (1 field touched this pass).

    Manifest row 12; auto_promote:false; Direct Qualified is instant/no evaluation;25/50/100/150k separated. Fee values untouched; DLL2%initial softflatten/sessionlockout; MLL trails EOD balance, breach can include floating equity, freeze atinitial. Scoped field review, not whole-plan acceptance. Held fields are deliberately absent from the confirmation map.

    max drawdown locks: confirmed

    No prior value is evidenced for this check. This is a record of our research, not a firm rule effective date.

    Link to this check
  • Confirmed, no changes

    Direct Qualified (instant-funded: skips the Evaluation stage, starts directly on a Qualified/funded account) · Normal corpus review current first party

    USD 100,000 · USD 150,000 · USD 25,000 · USD 50,000 · recorded field scope; not a whole-plan verification

    Field-by-field: 2 confirmed (2 fields touched this pass).

    Manifest row 7; auto_promote:false; Direct Qualified is instant/no evaluation;25/50/100/150k separated. Fee values untouched; DLL2%initial softflatten/sessionlockout; MLL trails EOD balance, breach can include floating equity, freeze atinitial. Scoped field review, not whole-plan acceptance. Held fields are deliberately absent from the confirmation map.

    payout profit split pct: confirmed profit target pct: confirmed

    No prior value is evidenced for this check. This is a record of our research, not a firm rule effective date.

    Link to this check
  • Confirmed, no changes

    Direct Qualified (instant-funded: skips the Evaluation stage, starts directly on a Qualified/funded account) · Normal corpus review current first party

    USD 100,000 · USD 150,000 · USD 25,000 · USD 50,000 · recorded field scope; not a whole-plan verification

    Field-by-field: 3 confirmed (3 fields touched this pass).

    Manifest row 8; auto_promote:false; Direct Qualified is instant/no evaluation;25/50/100/150k separated. Fee values untouched; DLL2%initial softflatten/sessionlockout; MLL trails EOD balance, breach can include floating equity, freeze atinitial. Scoped field review, not whole-plan acceptance. Held fields are deliberately absent from the confirmation map.

    daily loss amount basis: confirmed daily loss amount pct: confirmed max drawdown amount pct: confirmed

    No prior value is evidenced for this check. This is a record of our research, not a firm rule effective date.

    Link to this check
  • Confirmed, no changes

    Direct Qualified (instant-funded: skips the Evaluation stage, starts directly on a Qualified/funded account) · Normal corpus review current first party

    USD 100,000 · USD 150,000 · USD 25,000 · USD 50,000 · recorded field scope; not a whole-plan verification

    Manifest row 9; auto_promote:false; Direct Qualified is instant/no evaluation;25/50/100/150k separated. Fee values untouched; DLL2%initial softflatten/sessionlockout; MLL trails EOD balance, breach can include floating equity, freeze atinitial. Scoped field review, not whole-plan acceptance. Held fields are deliberately absent from the confirmation map.

    No prior value is evidenced for this check. This is a record of our research, not a firm rule effective date.

    Link to this check
  • Confirmed, no changes

    Direct Qualified (instant-funded: skips the Evaluation stage, starts directly on a Qualified/funded account) · Normal corpus review current first party

    USD 100,000 · USD 150,000 · USD 25,000 · USD 50,000 · recorded field scope; not a whole-plan verification

    Field-by-field: 3 confirmed (3 fields touched this pass).

    Manifest row 11; auto_promote:false; Direct Qualified is instant/no evaluation;25/50/100/150k separated. Fee values untouched; DLL2%initial softflatten/sessionlockout; MLL trails EOD balance, breach can include floating equity, freeze atinitial. Scoped field review, not whole-plan acceptance. Held fields are deliberately absent from the confirmation map.

    max drawdown anchor: confirmed max drawdown basis: confirmed max drawdown type: confirmed

    No prior value is evidenced for this check. This is a record of our research, not a firm rule effective date.

    Link to this check
  • Confirmed, no changes

    Direct Qualified (instant-funded: skips the Evaluation stage, starts directly on a Qualified/funded account) · Normal corpus review current first party

    USD 100,000 · USD 150,000 · USD 25,000 · USD 50,000 · recorded field scope; not a whole-plan verification

    Field-by-field: 2 confirmed (2 fields touched this pass).

    Manifest row 10; auto_promote:false; Direct Qualified is instant/no evaluation;25/50/100/150k separated. Fee values untouched; DLL2%initial softflatten/sessionlockout; MLL trails EOD balance, breach can include floating equity, freeze atinitial. Scoped field review, not whole-plan acceptance. Held fields are deliberately absent from the confirmation map.

    daily loss includes unrealized: confirmed daily loss on breach: confirmed

    No prior value is evidenced for this check. This is a record of our research, not a firm rule effective date.

    Link to this check
  • Confirmed · sources disagree on 0 field(s)

    Direct Qualified (instant-funded: skips the Evaluation stage, starts directly on a Qualified/funded account) · Normal corpus review current first party

    USD 100,000 · USD 150,000 · USD 25,000 · USD 50,000 · recorded field scope; not a whole-plan verification

    Manifest row 14; auto_promote:false; Direct Qualified: same article says greater-than-or-equal20 and greater-than20; payout enforcement versus stored pass enforcement/equality remains unresolved. Scoped field review, not whole-plan acceptance. Held fields are deliberately absent from the confirmation map.

    No prior value is evidenced for this check. This is a record of our research, not a firm rule effective date.

    Link to this check
  • Confirmed, no changes

    Direct Qualified (instant-funded: skips the Evaluation stage, starts directly on a Qualified/funded account) · Live primary source recheck

    USD 100,000 · USD 150,000 · USD 25,000 · USD 50,000 · recorded field scope; not a whole-plan verification

    Field-by-field: 7 noted (7 fields touched this pass).

    Live primary-source recheck 2026-08-12: 13 fields confirmed against Alpha Help Center; MLL evaluation_frequency stays conservative-intraday and is now live-supported ("break MLL at any point, floating equity") — disagree->sourced available.

    payout profit split pct: confirmed (90) consistency: confirmed (20% gate) daily loss: confirmed (2% Daily Loss Guard; $500/$1000/$2000/$3000; lockout; includes unrealized) max drawdown: confirmed (EOD-trailing MLL 4%/4%/3%/3%; $1000/$2000/$3000/$4500; locks at initial; includes unrealized) min trading days: confirmed (0) profit target pct: confirmed (null — Direct Qualified instant, no evaluation) pricing initial fee: confirmed (349/519/689/859 per size)

    No prior value is evidenced for this check. This is a record of our research, not a firm rule effective date.

    Link to this check
  • Confirmed · sources disagree on 1 field(s)

    Direct Qualified (instant-funded: skips the Evaluation stage, starts directly on a Qualified/funded account) · Two independent readers, each working blind to the other’s output and to the stored value

    USD 25,000 · recorded field scope; not a whole-plan verification

    Field-by-field: 13 confirmed · 1 preserved for the record (14 fields touched this pass).

    Two independent blind readers sourced Alpha Futures' DIRECT product (instant-funded — skips the Evaluation stage entirely, starts the trader directly on a funded/Qualified account) across all 4 covered sizes ($25K/$50K/$100K/$150K). CONFIRMED, all sizes: no pass/fail evaluation (hence min_trading_days=0 and no profit_target_pct/_abs — see that field's own reasoning for why this is agreement on substance, not a value conflict, and why it is left null rather than repurposed); Daily Loss Guard 2% of starting balance, fixed per size ($500/$1,000/$2,000/$3,000), soft breach (flattens + locks out until the next trading day, account NOT closed), counting unrealized P&L; Maximum Loss Limit (MLL) EOD-trailing off the end-of-day balance high (never an intraday high), non-proportional across sizes like Alpha's own Zero product (4%/4%/3%/3% = $1,000/$2,000/$3,000/$4,500), locking at the account's initial starting balance once reached, testing floating equity for breach; 20% Consistency Rule ('biggest day/total net profit since last request = 20%') gating each withdrawal request (not an evaluation pass — Direct has none), alongside a recurring Withdrawal Profit Target that RESETS after every withdrawal (1st $1,500/2nd+ $1,000 at 25K, scaling proportionally at the other 3 sizes — documented in phases[0].profit_target_pct's own reasoning, not modelled as a one-time pass/fail number); one-time per-size fee ($349/$519/$689/$859), no subscription; 90% profit split. GENUINE DISAGREEMENT (entered as ambiguities[], all 4 sizes): phases[0].max_drawdown.evaluation_frequency — reader A's material never addresses whether a breach is tested only at the EOD snapshot or continuously through the day; reader B supplies an explicit firm-wide quote naming continuous testing ('If you break MLL at any point, floating equity or closed balance of account, your account will be liquidated' — general MLL article, states it applies 'on all of our accounts'). This is a coverage gap in reader A's research, not a first-party statement contradicting reader B, so the conservative reading (intraday, the direction that never under-counts a breach) is carried as the headline value while both candidates are logged. FLAGGED, NOT ACTIONED (out of this task's scope, rules/alpha-futures-direct/ only): the SAME firm-wide MLL article underlies rules/alpha-zero/*.json and rules/alpha-advanced/*.json, both of which currently set evaluation_frequency='eod' via this corpus's generic derive-from-basis rule rather than independent sourcing — this Direct-driven finding is a candidate for a targeted recheck of those two sibling files. TWO SCHEMA-FIT LIMITATIONS DOCUMENTED, NOT MODELLED: (1) profit_target — see above; (2) consistency.enforced_at='pass' is the nearest enum value for what is actually a per-withdrawal-request gate (this schema has no 'per_withdrawal_request' value) — see phases[0].consistency's own reasoning, which also flags that tools/build-firm-presets.js's consistencyPct() wires effect='block' firms into the live simulator keyed to a 'pass' event, a potential incoherence with profit_target_pct=null that this corpus-only write surfaces but does not resolve. PRICING: list price entered ($349/$519/$689/$859, both readers corroborate); a reader-B-only 'launch offer' 35%-off promo code (DIRECT35) was NOT entered, matching this corpus's own rules/apex-eod/*.json precedent of withholding an unconfirmed-live promo price in favor of the stable list price. Golden vectors (rules/alpha-futures-direct/golden/) hand-recombine Direct's own $25,000/$1,000-MLL worked example and per-size Daily Loss Guard/MLL numbers with the firm-wide MLL trailing formula (itself explicitly quoted, not invented) into a non-breach floor-trail day and a 4-day breach walkthrough, following the same 'firm's own sourced mechanics, not a firm-narrated day-by-day walkthrough' pattern this corpus already uses for rules/goat-funded-trader/golden/static-drawdown-breach-100k.json; both vectors verified to reconcile exactly against tests/rules-reconciliation.test.js before this write.

    payout profit split pct: confirmed consistency: confirmed daily loss amount pct: confirmed daily loss includes unrealized: confirmed daily loss on breach: confirmed max drawdown amount pct: confirmed max drawdown anchor: confirmed max drawdown basis: confirmed max drawdown evaluation frequency: disagree max drawdown locks: confirmed max drawdown type: confirmed min trading days: confirmed profit target pct: confirmed pricing initial fee: confirmed

    No prior value is evidenced for this check. This is a record of our research, not a firm rule effective date.

    Link to this check
  • Confirmed · sources disagree on 1 field(s)

    Direct Qualified (instant-funded: skips the Evaluation stage, starts directly on a Qualified/funded account) · Two independent readers, each working blind to the other’s output and to the stored value

    USD 100,000 · USD 150,000 · USD 50,000 · recorded field scope; not a whole-plan verification

    Field-by-field: 13 confirmed · 1 preserved for the record (14 fields touched this pass).

    Two independent blind readers sourced Alpha Futures' DIRECT product (instant-funded — skips the Evaluation stage entirely, starts the trader directly on a funded/Qualified account) across all 4 covered sizes ($25K/$50K/$100K/$150K). CONFIRMED, all sizes: no pass/fail evaluation (hence min_trading_days=0 and no profit_target_pct/_abs — see that field's own reasoning for why this is agreement on substance, not a value conflict, and why it is left null rather than repurposed); Daily Loss Guard 2% of starting balance, fixed per size ($500/$1,000/$2,000/$3,000), soft breach (flattens + locks out until the next trading day, account NOT closed), counting unrealized P&L; Maximum Loss Limit (MLL) EOD-trailing off the end-of-day balance high (never an intraday high), non-proportional across sizes like Alpha's own Zero product (4%/4%/3%/3% = $1,000/$2,000/$3,000/$4,500), locking at the account's initial starting balance once reached, testing floating equity for breach; 20% Consistency Rule ('biggest day/total net profit since last request = 20%') gating each withdrawal request (not an evaluation pass — Direct has none), alongside a recurring Withdrawal Profit Target that RESETS after every withdrawal (1st $1,500/2nd+ $1,000 at 25K, scaling proportionally at the other 3 sizes — documented in phases[0].profit_target_pct's own reasoning, not modelled as a one-time pass/fail number); one-time per-size fee ($349/$519/$689/$859), no subscription; 90% profit split. GENUINE DISAGREEMENT (entered as ambiguities[], all 4 sizes): phases[0].max_drawdown.evaluation_frequency — reader A's material never addresses whether a breach is tested only at the EOD snapshot or continuously through the day; reader B supplies an explicit firm-wide quote naming continuous testing ('If you break MLL at any point, floating equity or closed balance of account, your account will be liquidated' — general MLL article, states it applies 'on all of our accounts'). This is a coverage gap in reader A's research, not a first-party statement contradicting reader B, so the conservative reading (intraday, the direction that never under-counts a breach) is carried as the headline value while both candidates are logged. FLAGGED, NOT ACTIONED (out of this task's scope, rules/alpha-futures-direct/ only): the SAME firm-wide MLL article underlies rules/alpha-zero/*.json and rules/alpha-advanced/*.json, both of which currently set evaluation_frequency='eod' via this corpus's generic derive-from-basis rule rather than independent sourcing — this Direct-driven finding is a candidate for a targeted recheck of those two sibling files. TWO SCHEMA-FIT LIMITATIONS DOCUMENTED, NOT MODELLED: (1) profit_target — see above; (2) consistency.enforced_at='pass' is the nearest enum value for what is actually a per-withdrawal-request gate (this schema has no 'per_withdrawal_request' value) — see phases[0].consistency's own reasoning, which also flags that tools/build-firm-presets.js's consistencyPct() wires effect='block' firms into the live simulator keyed to a 'pass' event, a potential incoherence with profit_target_pct=null that this corpus-only write surfaces but does not resolve. PRICING: list price entered ($349/$519/$689/$859, both readers corroborate); a reader-B-only 'launch offer' 35%-off promo code (DIRECT35) was NOT entered, matching this corpus's own rules/apex-eod/*.json precedent of withholding an unconfirmed-live promo price in favor of the stable list price. Golden vectors (rules/alpha-futures-direct/golden/) hand-recombine Direct's own $25,000/$1,000-MLL worked example and per-size Daily Loss Guard/MLL numbers with the firm-wide MLL trailing formula (itself explicitly quoted, not invented) into a non-breach floor-trail day and a 4-day breach walkthrough, following the same 'firm's own sourced mechanics, not a firm-narrated day-by-day walkthrough' pattern this corpus already uses for rules/goat-funded-trader/golden/static-drawdown-breach-100k.json; both vectors (built at the $25,000 size, which corresponds to Direct's own published worked example) verified to reconcile exactly against tests/rules-reconciliation.test.js before this write.

    payout profit split pct: confirmed consistency: confirmed daily loss amount pct: confirmed daily loss includes unrealized: confirmed daily loss on breach: confirmed max drawdown amount pct: confirmed max drawdown anchor: confirmed max drawdown basis: confirmed max drawdown evaluation frequency: disagree max drawdown locks: confirmed max drawdown type: confirmed min trading days: confirmed profit target pct: confirmed pricing initial fee: confirmed

    No prior value is evidenced for this check. This is a record of our research, not a firm rule effective date.

    Link to this check

Earlier record links

These retained links open the complete size and program membership of the earlier grouped record. Each distinct check now has its own link.

2026-10-04 · earlier grouped record

2026-08-12 · earlier grouped record

2026-07-31 · earlier grouped record

What the rules say now

profit target pct

25000null
1.) No Evaluation, jump straight into a Qualified Account from day one 2.) 90% profit split on
retrieved sourced
50000null
1.) No Evaluation, jump straight into a Qualified Account from day one 2.) 90% profit split on
retrieved sourced
100000null
1.) No Evaluation, jump straight into a Qualified Account from day one 2.) 90% profit split on
retrieved sourced
150000null
1.) No Evaluation, jump straight into a Qualified Account from day one 2.) 90% profit split on
retrieved sourced

min trading days (same across all modelled sizes)

All sizes0
'No Evaluation, jump straight into a Qualified Account from day one.' Neither reader found any stated minimum number of trading days for Direct at any size.
retrieved sourced

daily loss amount pct (same across all modelled sizes)

All sizes2
Parameters Direct 25K Direct 50K Direct 100K Direct 150K Maximum Loss Limit $1,000 $2,000 $3,000 $4,500 Daily Loss Guard $500 $1,000 $2,000 $3,000 One Time Fee $349 $519 $689 $859
retrieved sourced

max drawdown amount pct

250004
Parameters Direct 25K Direct 50K Direct 100K Direct 150K Maximum Loss Limit $1,000 $2,000 $3,000 $4,500 Daily Loss Guard $500 $1,000 $2,000 $3,000 One Time Fee $349 $519 $689 $859
retrieved sourced
500004
Parameters Direct 25K Direct 50K Direct 100K Direct 150K Maximum Loss Limit $1,000 $2,000 $3,000 $4,500 Daily Loss Guard $500 $1,000 $2,000 $3,000 One Time Fee $349 $519 $689 $859
retrieved sourced
1000003
Parameters Direct 25K Direct 50K Direct 100K Direct 150K Maximum Loss Limit $1,000 $2,000 $3,000 $4,500 Daily Loss Guard $500 $1,000 $2,000 $3,000 One Time Fee $349 $519 $689 $859
retrieved sourced
1500003
Parameters Direct 25K Direct 50K Direct 100K Direct 150K Maximum Loss Limit $1,000 $2,000 $3,000 $4,500 Daily Loss Guard $500 $1,000 $2,000 $3,000 One Time Fee $349 $519 $689 $859
retrieved sourced

max drawdown type (same across all modelled sizes)

All sizestrailing
The Maximum Loss Limit is calculated from your account balance high at the end of each trading day, not intraday equity high like many others out there.
retrieved sourced

max drawdown basis (same across all modelled sizes)

All sizesend-of-day balance
The Maximum Loss Limit is calculated from your account balance high at the end of each trading day, not intraday equity high like many others out there.
retrieved sourced

max drawdown locks (same across all modelled sizes)

All sizes[object Object]
Maximum Loss Limit stops trailing at the account starting balance on all of our accounts.
retrieved sourced

consistency (same across all modelled sizes)

All sizes[object Object]
'There is a 20% Consistency Rule on Direct Qualified Accounts.' Formula (same article): 'biggest day/total net profit (since last request) = 20%.' Direct Account Overview: traders 'need to reach their Withdrawal Profit Target as well as a 20% Consistency Rule in order to make a withdrawal request.'
retrieved sourced

Rules and their verification status change without notice; the firm's own documentation is always the final authority. This page is independent research, not investment or trading advice, and PropSurvival is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Alpha Futures — Direct Qualified.