Skip to content
PropSurvival
Firm rules · Payout rules · Alpha Futures Advanced

What gates an Alpha Futures Advanced payout when there is no daily loss limit?

Rules read from Alpha Futures help articles, retrieved 2026-07-16 · two-pass recheck 2026-07-22 (confirmed with disagreement on consistency %) · page rewritten 2026-08-26
Citable answer · extract this block

Alpha Futures Advanced pays a 90% profit split and has no daily loss limit — Advanced is the no-DLL plan. The maximum loss limit is 3.5% end-of-day trailing off the end-of-day balance high, and it locks at starting balance. Help articles set a 40% best-day raise-until-compliant consistency target, not a breach; the homepage FAQ still says 50% (the retired Standard figure). We log that conflict and do not pick a winner. First-payout day count and payout cycle are not recorded. Run your own win rate and average R against Alpha Futures's full published rule set in the free calculator at run your own book against Alpha Futures Advanced — free.

Source: https://propsurvival.com/firm-rules/alpha-advanced-payout-rules · corpus Alpha Futures · re-checked 2026-09-02: the cited wording was no longer found — the rule may have changed; check the source link · free calculator: run your own book against Alpha Futures Advanced — free

Numbers first: 90% split · no DLL · 3.5% EOD trailing. Answer first: On Alpha Futures Advanced the split is 90% and there is no daily loss guard. The account-ending line is a 3.5% maximum loss limit that trails the end-of-day balance high and locks at starting balance. Targets are a flat 8% ($4,000 / $8,000 / $12,000). Consistency is a 40% best-day raise-until-compliant cap, not a breach — and the homepage FAQ still prints 50%, the retired Standard figure. First-payout timing and the cycle are not recorded.

The payout terms we actually have

Advanced is a one-step evaluation. The payout object on every size we carry is thin on purpose: the firm published a split, and it did not publish a first-payout clock or a repeating cycle in the documents we verified. Filling those blanks would be guessing.

FieldValue
ProductAdvanced (not Direct, not Zero)
Profit split90% to the trader
First payout afterNot recorded
Payout cycleNot recorded
Fee / reset / refundNot recorded
Minimum trading days0 recorded (the 40% cap still needs more than one green day)

The 90% split is the same at 50k, 100k and 150k. Direct and Zero share that headline number and nothing else on this page. They are other products; this article does not model them.

Account sizes: 8% target, 3.5% MLL, no daily loss

Every Advanced size we hold uses the same percentages. The dollars scale; the shape does not. Daily loss is a sourced zero — the Advanced overview's words are “Daily Loss Guard NONE.”

AccountProfit target (8%)Daily lossMLL (3.5% EOD trailing)MLL lock
50k$4,000None$1,750Starting balance ($50,000)
100k$8,000None$3,500Starting balance ($100,000)
150k$12,000None$5,250Starting balance ($150,000)

The target is 8%. The MLL gap is 3.5%. You have to bank more than twice the starting cushion while the floor is still allowed to climb for the first 3.5% of that path, then freeze at the number you started with.

No daily loss limit — that is the product

Advanced is the no-DLL plan. That is why this evaluation is its own corpus slug, not an empty cell we forgot to fill. A session that goes $2,000 against you and comes back before the close does not trip a daily guard, because there is no daily guard. The account is not paused for the rest of the day. The close is the test: the only published loss line that can end Advanced is the 3.5% MLL. Sizing as if a daily lockout will save you is using a rule that is not on this product. The Advanced daily loss page records none at 50k, 100k and 150k.

The MLL that climbs, then stops at starting balance

The maximum loss limit is trailing, evaluated from end-of-day balance, never described as an intraday trail. The MLL article states it is end of day on all accounts, and that it stops trailing at the account starting balance. Corpus: 3.5% of initial ($1,750 / $3,500 / $5,250), basis end-of-day balance, lock at initial plus zero. Open P&L at the close counts toward that balance; that is not a tick-by-tick floor, and we do not upgrade an EOD test into an intraday one.

Start of a 50k: balance $50,000, floor $48,250. A new end-of-day high lifts the floor until it has risen $1,750 and sits on $50,000. After that print, further highs do not lift it. The lock is at starting balance, not at the profit-target balance. Once locked, a give-back that stays above $50,000 leaves the account alive; a close below $50,000 does not.

Worked path — 50k Advanced

  1. Start $50,000. Floor 3.5% below, at $48,250.
  2. Close at $51,000. Floor trails to $49,250.
  3. Close at $51,750. Floor hits starting balance $50,000 and locks.
  4. Close at the 8% target, $54,000. Floor still $50,000 — room is now $4,000, not $1,750.
  5. A close at $50,400 survives. A close at $49,900 does not. The lock stopped the floor rising; it did not delete the floor.

After 3.5% of closed progress, further profit no longer tightens the floor. Until that lock prints, every new end-of-day high puts the floor back to a 3.5% gap. The dangerous stretch is the first $1,750 of progress, not the last.

MLL floor — trails, then locks at start end-of-day balance $48.25k $50k lock $54k $51.75k high locks floor 8% target start lock print target still above lock floor stays $50k

50k Advanced: wine is the MLL floor, climbing with the end-of-day high until it meets starting balance, then flat. Grey is balance. The lock is a ceiling on the floor, not a deletion of the floor.

The trailing-drawdown page walks the same 3.5% figure as a drawdown mechanic. It sits here because a payout you cannot survive to request is not a payout.

40% in the help articles, 50% on the homepage

This is the first-party finding, and we will not sand it into a single number. Two independent recheck passes on 2026-07-22 agreed on split, 8% targets, 3.5% MLL, EOD trail, lock at start, no daily loss, and raise-until-compliant. They disagreed — because the firm disagrees with itself — on the consistency percentage.

The Advanced overview and the consistency-rule article state 40%, on Evaluation only, as a best-day share of total profit. The effect is raise-until-compliant, not a breach. One oversized green day does not close the account; it raises the remaining target until that day is no more than 40% of the pile. Bank the whole $4,000 50k target in one session and the implied total at a 40% cap is $4,000 / 0.40 = $10,000. That is a longer exam, not a failed one.

The homepage FAQ still says 50% consistency rule — the retired Standard plan's figure. We did not enter 50% into the live rule object, and we did not delete the homepage sentence. Recheck outcome: confirmed with disagreement on consistency only. Picking 40% as “ours” or 50% as “noise” would be arbitrating a conflict the source has not resolved.

Logged, not judged. Corpus: 40% best-day share, Evaluation only, raise-until-compliant. Homepage FAQ: 50%, inherited from Standard. We publish both. We do not pick the number a live account will be scored against. The Advanced consistency page is the mechanic in isolation; it sits on this payout page because the raise is what delays a split you thought you had already earned. Min trading days in the JSON is 0; a 40% (or 50%) best-day cap is still a multi-day constraint, because one full-target day cannot be 40% of itself.

What the corpus does not record

Two payout clocks are null on every Advanced size: first-payout day count and cycle days. Fee, reset, and fee-refund are also null. This page will not fill them from a banner. We also do not publish a funded-stage consistency percentage: the sourced quote is “40% on Evaluation only.”

Advanced is not Direct, and not Zero

Alpha retired Standard and launched Direct as an instant-funded product. Zero is a separate evaluation. This page is Advanced only — 50k / 100k / 150k, 8% targets, no daily loss, 3.5% EOD MLL that locks at start, 90% split, consistency raise-until-compliant. Direct and Zero numbers do not belong here, and we are not going to summarise those products in this article.

Working backwards: free path before a no-DLL day spends the whole Advanced room.

Numbers first: 90% split · no daily loss · 3.5% EOD trailing lock-at-start · 40% vs 50% consistency conflict. Answer first: run Alpha Futures Advanced against your own numbers in the free calculator before treating the homepage FAQ as the rule.

Run Alpha Futures Advanced in the simulator — free

Questions that are actually about Advanced payouts

"Daily Loss Guard NONE" · "MLL 50K$1,750/100K$3,500/150K$5,250" · "Advanced target 50K$4,000/100K$8,000/150K$12,000" · "40% on Evaluation only" · "MLL is EOD (end of day) trailing on all accounts" · "stops trailing at the account starting balance". Recheck 2026-07-22, two-pass blind, outcome confirmed, with one reviewer disagreement noted, on consistency percentage only. Alpha Futures — Advanced account overview: help.alpha-futures.com/en/articles/11634907-advanced-account-overview · Maximum loss limit (MLL): help.alpha-futures.com/en/articles/9491999-maximum-loss-limit-mll · Consistency rule: help.alpha-futures.com/en/articles/9492048-consistency-rule — retrieved 2026-07-16, rechecked 2026-07-22.

Rules change without notice; the firm's own documentation is always the final authority. This page is independent research, not investment or trading advice, and PropSurvival is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Alpha Futures. No outcome is promised. Simulated result from user-supplied inputs.