Maven Trading — Verification Record

This is the complete, dated record of every independent verification pass this corpus has run against Maven Trading's own published rules, beyond the initial read: what was checked, what the check found, what changed, and what was preserved for the record even where two readings disagreed. See how a number gets checked twice for the method behind every entry below.

• 2026-07-31 Correction applied

  Two independent readers, each working blind to the other’s output and to the stored value

  Field-by-field: 5 resolved (5 fields touched this pass).

  Targeted recheck (operator-directed, batch 3, 2026-07-31): two FRESH independent blind readers, working from raw HTML via curl (not AI-summarized fetches, to rule out paraphrase artifacts), specifically asked whether Maven's Standard 1-Step Challenge drawdown mechanic is trailing or static. BOTH concluded TRAILING, 5%, anchored to the highest equity watermark - matching this file's prior conservative pick - and, critically, both independently explained WHY the earlier '8% STATIC...does not trail' reading existed on the site at all: it describes a DIFFERENT Maven product (the Two-Step / Two-Step Omo Challenge states '8% maximum loss limit (static from the initial balance)' in the same T&C paragraph structure, one line away from the One-Step's 5% trailing figure; a separate FAQ comparison table lists 'Two Step Challenge: Max Drawdown: 8% (Static)' directly adjacent to 'One Step Challenge: Max Drawdown: 5% (trailing off your highest watermark of equity)'). The prior pass's reader most plausibly read the Two-Step's static figure and mis-scoped it to the One-Step. The SAME fresh reads also independently re-confirmed, via the identical FAQ comparison table and the /challenges/1-step product page, the other three previously-disputed rate fields for this product: profit target 8%, daily drawdown 3%, max drawdown 5% - all matching this file's prior conservative picks, now corroborated by two fresh sources reading the correct page/product tab (the earlier disagreement on these three came from one reader having read a different Maven product's pricing tab, per this recheck's own diagnosis). Resolved, now sourced/derived: max_drawdown.type (trailing), max_drawdown.anchor (highest_water_mark), profit_target_pct (8), daily_loss.amount_pct (3), max_drawdown.amount_pct (5). Not resolved by this check: min_trading_days - not addressed by either reader this pass, ambiguities[] entry (null vs 4) stands unchanged. Status change: rules/unverified/maven-trading/ -> rules/maven-trading/. No worked example specific to this product's rate was found by either recheck pass either - the golden vector at hand-derived/ remains hand-derived tier, not firm_published_example, consistent with its original filing.

  Sources consulted: https://maventrading.com/terms-and-conditions, https://maventrading.com/faqs, https://maventrading.com/challenges/1-step — checked 2026-07-31
• 2026-07-30 Confirmed, items preserved for the record

  Two independent readers, each working blind to the other’s output and to the stored value

  Field-by-field: 2 confirmed · 6 preserved for the record (8 fields touched this pass).

  Both passes agree this is a single-phase ('Standard 1-Step') challenge with an 80% profit split and no consistency rule. Not resolved this pass: pass A read a single self-consistent Terms & Conditions paragraph naming itself 'a single-phase program' with 8% target / 5% trailing loss / 3% daily loss; pass B read a 'Phase 1 6% / Phase 2 8% / Funded' framing (a two-step-shaped structure) for the target, a 4%/$400-on-$10k daily loss, an 8%-static/does-not-trail max drawdown, plus a 4-day trading minimum with no supporting quote - and pass B's tooltip for the consistency field even names 'two-step' rather than this product. This pattern (five fields, one direction) reads as pass B having captured data from a different Maven product/tab rather than five independent factual disagreements, but neither pass's material was discarded: every disagreement is preserved in ambiguities[], resolved conservatively where the template provides a rule (harder-target / tighter-limit), and to pass A's product-specific reading where the resolution is a reliability judgment (min_trading_days). Maven's FAQ separately publishes a generic worked example of a RECALCULATING trailing-drawdown mechanic (equity $1,000, 3% cushion, $1,100 equity -> new $33 cushion) that neither pass's percentage matches - used only as corroboration that Maven's trailing concept is real, not as a source for this product's rate. NOT reconciled against a golden vector at any of this product's real account sizes: the only worked example on the firm's site uses an illustrative $1,000 balance that is not one of the 2k-100k sizes this product is sold at.

  Sources consulted: https://maventrading.com/terms-and-conditions, https://maventrading.com/faqs, https://maventrading.com/challenges/1-step, https://maventrading.com/pricing — checked 2026-07-30

Rules and their verification status change without notice; the firm's own documentation is always the final authority. This page is independent research, not investment or trading advice, and PropSurvival is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Maven Trading.