Blueberry Funded — Verification Record
This is the complete, dated record of every independent verification pass this corpus has run against Blueberry Funded's own published rules, beyond the initial read: what was checked, what the check found, what changed, and what was preserved for the record even where two readings disagreed. See how a number gets checked twice for the method behind every entry below.
- 2026-07-31 Confirmed, items preserved for the record
Two independent readers, each working blind to the other’s output and to the stored value
Field-by-field: 8 confirmed · 7 preserved for the record (15 fields touched this pass).
Two blind independent first-party readers, second-chance worked-example search for a new firm (no prior corpus entry existed). Both agree on every headline number across all 7 covered sizes (profit targets 8%/6%, daily loss 4%, max drawdown 10% static, no consistency rule) and on the $100,000 worked example ($4,000 daily / $90,000 max floor). Disagreements (not taken at face value - see the 2026-07-31 direct-verification recheck below for resolution): (a) daily_loss basis/reference-point wording differed between readers, one paraphrasing the fixed-initial-% allowance, the other flagging an apparent EOD-vs-start-of-day contradiction between the overview and drawdown-limits articles; (b) daily_loss.includes_unrealized: reader_a null (not found), reader_b true; (c) min_trading_days: reader_a 5, reader_b null, on every single account size - the recurring pattern across all 7 sizes was itself a signal that this was a systematic misattribution rather than a per-size data problem. Several other flagged 'disagreements' (daily_loss.on_breach, max_drawdown.anchor, max_drawdown.locks_at) were paraphrase pairs of the same agreed fact, not value-level conflicts, once the full quotes were compared side by side.
Sources consulted: https://help.blueberryfunded.com/en/articles/12136509-what-is-the-prime-challenge, https://help.blueberryfunded.com/en/articles/12136586-what-are-the-drawdown-limits-on-a-prime-account, https://help.blueberryfunded.com/en/articles/9812246-does-blueberry-funded-enforce-a-consistency-rule-in-trading — checked 2026-07-31 - 2026-07-31 Confirmed, disputed items resolved
Direct primary source fetch
Field-by-field: 3 resolved · 1 noted (4 fields touched this pass).
Before writing this corpus entry, re-fetched all 7 first-party Blueberry Funded help-center articles in full (not the two blind readers' summaries) to resolve every {agree:false} field from the merge, per this corpus's 'ambiguities[] needs >=2 distinct candidates, not a single-candidate agreement' rule. Findings: (1) the 'EOD' vs 'start of day' daily-reference wording is a paraphrase of the identical daily-rollover instant across two pages (Prime Challenge overview vs the dedicated drawdown-limits article), not two distinct mechanics - no ambiguities[] entry warranted. (2) includes_unrealized is directly sourced true from the drawdown-limits article's own real-time-equity language, upgrading it from an assumed default. (3) min_trading_days=5 (reader_a) is the SAME kind of misattribution already confirmed for Tradeify Growth's 35% consistency rule: the firm's own dedicated 'How Many Active Trading Days?' article states the 5-day figure applies to funded-stage PAYOUT cycles ('Prime Challenge payouts require a minimum of 5 active trading days per cycle'), not to Phase 1/Phase 2 evaluation passage - no evaluation-stage minimum-days statement exists anywhere in the Prime Challenge (2-Step) help collection. (4) that same 5-day figure is recorded in provenance['payout.first_payout_after_days'] but NOT written into the field, because it is a recurring per-cycle qualifying-day threshold (>=5 days each >=0.5% realized profit, every 14-day reward cycle), not a one-time N-days-after-funding count. Net result: zero ambiguities[] entries survive scrutiny for this firm/product at any of the 7 covered sizes - every apparent two-reader disagreement resolved to either a confirmed single value or a documented non-conflict, not a genuine unresolved fork.
Sources consulted: https://help.blueberryfunded.com/en/articles/12136509-what-is-the-prime-challenge, https://help.blueberryfunded.com/en/articles/12136586-what-are-the-drawdown-limits-on-a-prime-account, https://help.blueberryfunded.com/en/articles/12136639-how-many-active-trading-days, https://help.blueberryfunded.com/en/articles/12136624-reward-structure, https://help.blueberryfunded.com/en/articles/9812246-does-blueberry-funded-enforce-a-consistency-rule-in-trading, https://help.blueberryfunded.com/en/articles/9773783-refund-policy, https://help.blueberryfunded.com/en/articles/12140976-what-happens-if-you-breach-the-rules-in-the-prime-challenge — checked 2026-07-31
See Blueberry Funded's rules against your own numbers
The free simulator applies Blueberry Funded's full published rule set — the same rules this page's checks were run against — to your own win rate, average R and risk size.
Run Blueberry Funded in the simulator — freeRules and their verification status change without notice; the firm's own documentation is always the final authority. This page is independent research, not investment or trading advice, and PropSurvival is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Blueberry Funded.